Date: 22.4.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 708
Collegepaperworld.coolessay.xyz #Essay on human interaction

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Essay on human interaction

Essay on human interaction

Mar/Sun/2018 | Uncategorized





Essay on Social Interaction

Essay on human interaction

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content -
Essay on Social Interaction

annotate essay Once upon a time there was a hard-working student who paid close attention to lectures, studied hard, and essay learned how to cite properly in both MLA and APA format. The sun shone brightly. Then one day a dark cloud overshadowed the world. A professor asked the student to write an annotated bibliography. The student grew pale.

She thought she had mastered all things related to citation. She didn’t want to personal engineering grad school learn how to write anything so terrible sounding as an annotated bibliography . She closed her eyes tightly and wished her fairy godmother would magically write the annotated bibliography for her. POOF! Her fairy godmother appeared! “I will grant your wish….well, sorta,” said the fairy godmother. “I will not write the annotated bibliography for essay you, but I will teach you how to write one, thus enabling you to use the skill in your future courses.” She wrote this blog post to teach all students how to write an of women essay annotated bibliography that works. What Is an Annotated Bibliography?

An annotated bibliography is essay on human interaction simply a bibliography with annotations. Development In India Essay! Okay, that doesn’t help much, does it? Really, though, that’s all it is. On Human! You know how to write a Works Cited or Reference page, right? If you’ve mastered this, the next step is to shy seamus simply add the annotations. Annotations include a summary of the work, a critique of the author or credibility of the source, and a discussion of whether or not the essay on human interaction source will be useful to essays good or bad your research. Essay Interaction! Why Write an lamb of elia Annotated Bibliography? I’m sure you’re saying, “Give me one good reason why I should write an essay on human annotated bibliography.” I’ll do better than that. I’ll give you three!

1. It’s a course assignment. If you want to do well in pledge the course, you need to do it. Enough said. 2 . An annotated bibliography helps you become a better researcher. In order to write an annotated bibliography, you need to essay on human interaction be able to allegiance summarize the source. This means you’ll need to take the time to read it carefully. You can’t just find a source and add it to essay on human interaction the list without reading it. Allegiance! You also need to evaluate the source and decide whether or not it’s credible and whether or not it’s useful. Doing so means you’ll choose sources more carefully and actually search for useful information.

No more picking the first few websites that show up on a Google search and trying to make them fit. 3. Essay On Human Interaction! An annotated bibliography saves you time. Allegiance Pledge! If you’re writing a research paper with three sources, it’s pretty easy to remember what you read in interaction each source. If, on the other hand, you’re writing a longer research paper and using 10 or more sources, it’s not that easy. Imagine you’re on page 5 of your research essay, and you remember reading the perfect quote about binge drinking in…um…well, you read it in one of your sources, somewhere . Unless you have some magic fairy dust to help remember everything you’ve read, you’ll likely spend 25 minutes looking for that perfect quote. Good! Trust me, writing an annotated bibliography may seem like a major pain now, but once you see how much time it will save you, and once you see a good grade on your paper, you’ll be happy you wrote it. Do your research! You can’t exactly write an essay on human interaction annotated bibliography without sources, so start researching!

RESEARCH TIP: Save, bookmark, or print more sources than you think you’ll need. Sometimes even the seemingly best sources just don’t quite work for your paper. Read and take notes. You don’t have to personal statement grad spend hours taking notes on every little detail, but you should mark the essay following, as you’ll need them to write your annotations: The main ideas of the allegiance essay pledge source Questions or comments about the argument’s or author’s credibility Key points or quotes that you might include in essay interaction your paper Whether or not the on competition source will be useful in your research paper. Now that you’ve found your sources and taken notes, we can get down to the business of writing. Remember, there will be no waiving of on human fairy godmother wands to magically produce a completed annotated bibliography. Argumentative Inflation! You will need to write your own. So let’s get started.

How to Write an Annotated Bibliography that Works. Not all annotated bibliographies are written in essay on human interaction the same way. Some include primarily summary and informative annotations. Others include a critique of sources. Most annotated bibliographies contain some combination of in india elements and can vary in word count. Essay Interaction! Don’t assume you know which type you should be writing. Ask your professor about the exact requirements for your assignment. Follow these 3 steps to learn about the essay inflation basics of how to write an annotated bibliography. Step 1: Cite your source in proper APA, MLA, or other required citation style. On Human! Each of your entries will begin with a full bibliographic entry.

This entry looks just like the entry you’d include on allegiance pledge, a regular Works Cited or Reference page. Entries are even alphabetized by author’s last name, just like a Works Cited or Reference page. Here’s an interaction example I created to good show you what the citation will look like. Robertson, A. Essay On Human! (2012). Why fairy tales are important. Psychology Today. (13) 2, 210-222. Essay On Grade! MLA format – 7th edition. Roberston, Ann. “Why Fairy Tales are Important.” Psychology Today. 13.2 (2012): 210-222.

Print. MLA format – 8th edition. Roberston, Ann. “Why Fairy Tales Are Important.” Psychology Today, vol. 13, no. 2, 2012, pp. 210-222. Step 2: Summarize the essay source.

A summary explains the main ideas of the source. Someone else should be able to twice heaney essay read your summary and know exactly what the source is on human about. This isn’t the time to tell readers whether or not you like the source. Allegiance Essay! Be objective. Just state what the source is about. No more, no less. Essay On Human Interaction! Here’s an of women in india example of what a summary of an article might look like. Robertson’s article argues that fairy tales are important because they teach children moral tales of right and essay wrong and provide children an outlet for essays on competition their emotions. Fairy tales also allow children to develop their imagination and essay critical thinking as they journey with characters to magical lands. Step 3: Evaluate the source. Here’s your chance to write a brief paragraph or two to tell readers what you think of the source and how it fits into personal engineering your own research.

I’ve color coded the questions you should ask, so that you can clearly see what’s going on in my example below. Ask yourself these questions : Is the author credible? What did I like or not like about the source? Are the arguments effective? Does the author support her arguments? What are the strengths and weaknesses? How might I incorporate this source into my paper? Answering these types of questions will help you formulate an effective critique and evaluation of each source. Here’s an example of what your evaluation might look like. Dr. Robertson is a well-known children’s psychologist who also has elementary education experience.

Her articles are published in a number of peer-reviewed journals, and essay her work is considered credible . The article will be an excellent source for my paper because it includes recent studies about children’s appreciation for fairy tales and features a detailed discussion of why fairy tales are beneficial to children . Robertson even includes interviews with children that I may be able to essays or bad use in my introduction . That wasn’t as bad as you thought, was it? Just three quick steps and you have an annotated bibliography! If you need a quick way to remember the steps in writing an on human interaction annotated bibliography, just remember CSE : Cite, Summarize, Evaluate. Writing your annotated bibliography in small steps can make a large task seem far less intimidating. Now that you know how to write each part of an annotated bibliography, the final step is to put it all together and make sure it’s in proper format. Follow these links to see a completed annotated bibliography. At the end of the day, the student learned how to write an charles lamb annotated bibliography. She knew she needed to write an appropriate MLA or APA citation followed by a summary and evaluation of the source.

The student worked diligently to write an annotated bibliography then had a Kibin editor review her work. Both the fairy godmother and interaction the student were delighted when the student received her final grade. And they all lived happily ever after. Useful Resources to Help Write an Annotated Bibliography. Writing an Annotated Bibliography: This source includes a list of verbs to allegiance essay pledge help you write about and summarize sources.

Annotated Bibliography: Tips for Writing: This source includes an overview of how to write an annotated bibliography and a template to help you write annotations. Finally, this short video provides a basic overview of an annotated bibliography. Psst. On Human Interaction! 98% of Kibin users report better grades! Get inspiration from over 500,000 example essays. Of Women Essay! About the Author.

Susan M. Inez is a professor of English and writing goddess based out of the Northeast. I am a freshman in college and I found this very helpful. Thank you for posting this for us students who need the information! This will also help me on my future Biology Lab Reports #128578; Sweet! We love to hear this. Thanks for your kind comment.

I#8217;d definitely recommend that you check out the resources at the end of the blog post #8212; there#8217;s lots of helpful information there, plus sample annotated bibliographies in MLA and APA styles. Let me know if you have a specific question that isn#8217;t answered! It is on human really helpful for me doing my resarch paper.

Custom Essay Order -
Essay on Social Interaction

resume texas tech Born February 28, 1967, US and Romanian Citizen. High school diploma , C.D. Loga High School, Timisoara, Romania, 1985. Coach for Mathematical Olympiads: Titu Andreescu. Diploma of interaction Merit in Mathematics , awarded by argumentative, the Romanian. Ministry of Education for the highest GPA in the country, University of essay Timisoara, Romania, 1989. Mentor: Gheorghe Eckstein. Dissertation: Invariant subspaces for subdecomposable operators.

Advisor: Florian-Horia Vasilescu. Dissertation: Problems in argumentative topology and operator theory. Assistant Professor , University of Michigan, 1997-2000 (post-doctoral position with Ruth Lawrence as mentor) Assistant Professor , Texas Tech University, 2000-2006. Associate Professor , Texas Tech University, 2006-2015. Professor , Texas Tech University, 2015-present. SHORT TERM APPOINTMENTS.

Coach of the US International Mathematical Olympiad Team, Mathematical Olympiad Summer Program, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2006-present. Visiting Professor , Université de Nantes, May 1999. Coach of the International Mathematical Olympiad Team of Brazil, Colégio Etapa, Saõ Paulo, Brazil, 2011, 2013. Coach of the essay on human interaction, International Mathematical Olympiad Team of India, Homi Bhabha Center of Science Education, Mumbai, India, 2004, 2005. Instructor , Awesome Math, Dallas, 2009, 2010, 2012. First Prize , Balkan Mathematical Olympiad, (Sofia, Bulgaria), 1985. First Prize , Romanian National Mathematical Competition for Universities Traian Lalescu, 1986. First Prize , Romanian National Mathematical Competition for Universities Traian Lalescu, 1987. First Prize , Romanian National Computer Programming Competition Grigore Moisil, 1987.

Romanian National Fellowship , 1987, 1988. Award for best performance on the qualifying examinations , Department of essays of elia Mathematics, University of Iowa, 1992. Outstanding Teaching Award , University of Iowa, 1997. D.C. Spriestersbach Dissertation Prize for best dissertation in Mathematical and interaction Physical Sciences and Engineering, University of Iowa, 1998. Rackham Summer Grant , University of Michigan, 1999. Research Enhancement Fund , Texas Tech University, 2000 and essays my relations 2001. Grant from the National Science Foundation for on human interaction, the study of the quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on development of women essay a surface, 2006-2009. Grant from the National Science Foundation for organizing The Topology and Geometry of Physics Conference, 2008. 1. Essay. Un problema de paridad y la formula de Green , Uinverso.math, Vol.2, no.

3, (2016). 2. Una aplicacion de la desigualdad isoperimetrica , with Cezar Lupu, Universo.math, Vol.2, no. Statement Engineering Grad. 2 (2015). 3. The topological quantum field theory of on human interaction classical theta functions with Alastair Hamilton, J. of Geometry and Physics, 98(2015), 242-261. Development Of Women Essay. 4. Essay. Una identidad algebraica y los determinantes circulantes, Universo.math, Vol. 2, no. 1 (2015). Lamb Of Elia My Relations. 5. Classical theta functions from a quantum group perspective with Alastair Hamilton, New York Journal of Mathematics, 21(2015), 93-127. 6. Essay. Un problema de geometria combinatoria y las curvas elipticas Universo.math, Vol. 1 no.

3 (2014). 7. Argumentative On Grade Inflation. Representations of the Kauffman bracket skein algebra of the punctured torus , with Jea-Pil Cho, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 225(2014), 45-55. 8. From classical theta functions to topological quantum field theory , with Alejandro Uribe, in L. Interaction. Katzarkov, E. Lupercio, and F. Turrubiates (eds.), The influence of Solomon Lefschetz in geometry and topology: 50 years of Mathematics at Cinvestav, Contemporary Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc., 2014. 9. Quantum mechanics and argumentative inflation non-abelian theta functions for essay interaction, the gauge group SU(2) , with Alejandro Uribe, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 228(2015), 97-137. 10. Dynamically consistent discrete-time Lotka-Volterra competition models , with Lih-Ing Roeger, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Supplement (2009), 650-658. Twice Essay. 11. Interaction. Some results about the Kauffman bracket skein module of the of women in india, twist knot exterior , with Fumikazu Nagasato, J. On Human. Knot Theory Ramif., 8(2006), 1095-1106. 12.

El polinomio de Jones y la mecanica cuantica , Aportaciones Math. Comun, 36, Soc. Mat. Mexicana, Mexico, (2006), 85--99. 13.

On the holomorphic point of view in the theory of quantum knot invariants , J. Geom. Development Essay. Phys., 56(2006), 2163-2176. 14. The computation of the noncommutative A-ideal for the figure eight knot , with Jeremy Sain, J. Knot Theory Ramif. 6(2004), Vol. 16, 1-24. 15. Interaction. The Weyl quantization and the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus are the same , with Alejandro Uribe, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 233(2003), 493-512. 16. Statement School. The noncommutative A-ideal of a (2p+1,2)-torus knot determines its Jones polynomial , with Jeremy Sain, J. On Human Interaction. Knot Theor. Ramif, 2(2003), Vol.

12, 187-201. 17. Development Essay. Noncommutative trigonometry and the A-polynomial of the trefoil knot , Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1(2002). 18. On the essay on human, relation between the allegiance, A-polynomial and the Jones polynomial , Proceedings Amer. Math.

Soc., 4(2001), Vol 130, 1235-1241. 19. On Human. The A-polynomial from the charles lamb essays of elia my relations, noncommutative viewpoint , with Charles Frohman and Walter Lofaro, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc., 354(2001), 735-747. Essay Interaction. 20. Skein modules and the noncommutative torus , with Charles Frohman, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc., 352(2000), 4877-4888. 21.

On the charles lamb of elia, formula for the quantum invariant of three manifolds with boundary , Bulletin Math. Soc. Sc. Math. Roumanie, 43(91) 2(2000). 22.

On the groupoid of essay interaction transformations of rigid structures , with Louis Funar, Journal of Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 4(1999), Vol 6, 599-646. 23. Essays On Competition Good. Topological SL(2,C) quantum field theory with corners , J. Knot Theor.

Ramif., 7(1998), 893-906. 24. Topological quantum field theory with corners based on the Kauffman bracket , Comment. Math. Helv., 72(1997), 216-243. 25.

The quantum invariant of the on human interaction, regular neighborhood of a link , Topology and its Applications 81(1997), 147-157. 26. Topological Hilbert Nullstellensatz for Bergman spaces , Integral Equations and Operator Theory, 28(1997), 191-195. 27. Rings with topologies induced by spaces of functions , Houston Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 21, no.2(1995), 395-406. 28. Compact perturbations of in india essay Fredholm n-tuples , Proceedings Amer. Math. Soc.

122(1994), 195-199. 29. Compact perturbations of essay interaction Fredholm n-tuples, II , Integral Equations and essays on competition Operator Theory 19(1994), 360-363. 30. Interaction. A short proof of a result on allegiance polynomials , Amer. Interaction. Math. Monthly 100(1993), 936-937. 1. Charles Of Elia My Relations. Putnam and Beyond , with Titu Andreescu, Springer, 2007, second edition scheduled 2016. Essay Interaction. 2. Mathematical Olympiad Challenges , with Titu Andreescu, Birkhauser, 2000, second edition 2008. 3. Theta Functions and Knots , World Scientific, 2014.

TALKS DELIVERED AT MEETINGS. 1. Theta functions and argumentative inflation knots , Conferencias Samuel Gitler, Mexico City, Mexico, October 2016. 2. Interaction. Theta functions and knots , Conference on Knot Theory and personal engineering school Its Applications to Physics and Quantum Computing, Dallas, TX, January 2015. Interaction. 3. Weyl quantization versus quantum group quantization of moduli spaces of twice shy seamus heaney essay flat connections on a surface , SMS Spring Conference on Quantization of interaction Moduli Spaces, Geneva, Switzerland, April 2014. Essay. 4. Theta functions and quantum field theory, National Meeting of the American Mathematical Society, Baltimore, MD, January 2014. 5. Essay Interaction. Classical theta functions in essays on competition good a quantum group perspective, 1080th Sectional Meeting of the essay on human interaction, American Mathematical Society, Washington, DC, March 2012. 6. Obtaining the Witten-Reshetikhin-Turaev invariants from quantum mechanical considerations, 50 Years of Topology, Geometry and charles of elia my relations Physics at interaction, Cinvestav, Mexico City, November 2011. 7. Charles Lamb. Representations of the Kauffman bracket skein algebra of the punctured torus, Knots in essay on human interaction Washington XXXII, Washington, DC, May 2011. 8. La teora Chern-Simons desde el punto de vista de la mecnica cuntica, Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Matemtica Mexicana, Tuxtla-Gutierrez, November 2010 (plenary talk).

9. Non-abelian theta functions a la Andre Weil , Knots in Washington XXX, Washington, DC, May 2010 (plenary talk). 10. The theory of classical theta functions from a topological perspective , 1060th Sectional Meeting of the American Mathematical Society, Newark, May 2010. 11. Engineering School. From classical theta functions to topological quantum field theory , 8th Joint Meeting of the American Mathematical Society and essay the Sociedad Matematica Mexicana, Berkeley, June 2010. 12. Theta functions and knots , Lloyd Roeling Mathematics Conference, Lafayette, Louisiana, November 2009. 13. Essay. The reduced Kauffman bracket skein algebra of the torus has a unique irreducible representation , 1037th Sectional Meeting of the AMS, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March 2008.

14. The quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on a surface determines the essay on human interaction, Reshetikhin-Turaev representation of the mapping class group , First Joint Meeting of the American Mathematical Society and the Polish Mathematical Society, Warsaw, Poland, August 2007. 15. The quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on engineering school a surface determines the Reshetikhin-Turaev representation of the mapping class group , A second time around the volume conjecture conference, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 2007. Essay Interaction. 16. The computation of the basis of the Hilbert space of a certain quantum system , National Meeting of the American Mathematical Society, San Antonio, January 2006.

17. El polinomio de Jones y la mecanica cuantica , Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Matematica Mexicana, Mexico City, October 2005. 18. On the statement engineering grad, holomorphic point of view in on human interaction the teory of quantum knot invariants , 1002nd Sectional Meeting of the AMS, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 2004. 19. Towards the computation of the noncommutative A-polynomial of twist knots , 1000th Sectional Meeting of the argumentative on grade, AMS, Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 2004.

20. On the quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus, 6th Joint meeting of the AMS and the SMM, Houston, May 2004. 21. The computation of the matrix of the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus , Spring Topology and Dynamical Systems Conference, Lubbock, March 2003. Essay On Human. 22. The computation of the noncommutative generalization of the A-polynomial for the figure-eight knot , National Meeting of the essays good, AMS, Baltimore, January 2003. 23.

On the quantization of the flat SU(2)-connections on the torus , International Conference on Geometric Topology, Xi'an, China, August 2002. 24. The Weyl quantization and essay the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus are the same , 974th Sectional Meeting of the AMS, Ann Arbor, Michigan, March 2002. 25. Skein modules and the Berezin quantization of the twice shy seamus essay, moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on on human interaction the torus , 972nd Sectional Meeting of the AMS, Irvine, California, November 2001. Shy Seamus Heaney Essay. 26. The noncommutative A-ideal of essay on human a (2,2p+1)-torus knot determines its Jones polynomial , 969th Sectional Meeting of the AMS, Columbus, Ohio, September 2001.

27. Kauffman bracket skein modules and character varieties , 5th Joint meeting of the AMS and SMM, Morelia, Mexico, May 2001. 28. Development Of Women In India. Kauffman bracket skein modules and essay interaction character varieties , Texas Geometry and argumentative essay inflation Topology Conference, February 2001 (plenary talk). 29. On the noncommutative version of the A-polynomial , 954-th Sectional AMS Meeting, Lafayette, Louisiana, April 2000.

30. On the essay on human interaction, relation between the A-polynomial and the Jones polynomial , AMS National Meeting, Washington, January 2000. 31. Personal Engineering School. Noncommutative trigonometry and the A-polynomial , 949-th Sectional AMS Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina, October 1999. 32. Interaction. Skein modules and noncommutative geometry , Summer School on Knot Invariants, Grenoble, France, June 1999. 33. Skein modules and the noncommutative torus , Knots in Hellas, Delphi, Greece, August 1998. 34.

Kauffman bracket skein modules and of women in india essay the noncommutative torus , 932-nd Sectional AMS Meeting, Manhattan, Kansas, March 1998. 35. On the quantum invariant of torus knots , 920-th Sectional AMS Meeting, College Park, Maryland, April 1997. 36. SL(2,C) topological quantum field theory with corners , 909-th Sectional AMS Meeting, Iowa City, March 1996. 37. Topological quantum field theory with corners , Thirteenth annual workshop on essay interaction geometric topology, Colorado Springs, June 1996. 38. Topological quantum field theory with corners based on the Jones-Wenzl idempotents , Great Plains Operator Theory Symposium, Phoenix, May 1996. 39.

Topological quantum field theory with corners via the Jones-Wenzl idempotents , Sixteenth International Operator Theory Conference, Timisoara, Romania, July 1996. 40. Topological SL(2,C) invariants for 3-manifolds with boundary , Minisemester in Knot Theory, Warsaw, Poland, July 1995. 41. On a conjecture of R. G. Douglas and V. Essay Pledge. Paulsen , South-Eastern Analysis Meeting, Atlanta, March 1995. 42. On a conjecture of R. G. Douglas and V. Paulsen , Great Plains Operator Theory Symposium, Cincinnati, May 1995. 43. Essay. Rings with topologies induced by spaces of functions , Great Plains Operator Theory Symposium, Lincoln, Nebraska, June 1994.

44. Personal Engineering. Fredholm n-tuples that cannot be perturbed with compacts to invertible ones , Great Plains Operator Theory Symposium, Boulder, Colorado, June 1993. 45. Fredholm n-tuples that cannot be perturbed with compacts to invertible ones , Amer. Essay On Human Interaction. Math. Pledge. Soc. Summer Research Conference in Multivariable Operator Theory, Seattle, July 1993. 1. Finite rank perturbations of Fredholm n-tuples , University of California at Riverside, October 1992.

2. Topological quantum field theory with corners , Indiana University, Bloomington, October 1996. 3. Topological quantum field theory with corners , Columbia University, New York, March 1997. 4. Topological quantum field theory with corners , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, February 1997. 5. Skein modules and the noncommutative torus , George Washington University, Washington, September 1998 (Colloquium talk). 6. Skein modules and the noncommutative torus , Northeastern University, Boston, March 1999. 7. Skein modules and interaction noncommutative geometry , Universite de Nantes, May 1999. 8. Heaney Essay. The A-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint , University of Texas at Austin, November 1999. 9. The A-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint , George Washington University, Washington, January 2000. 10. The A-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint , Michigan State University, East Lansing, January 2000. Essay On Human Interaction. 11.

Skein modules and noncommutative geometry , SUNY at Buffalo, February 2000 (Colloquium talk). Argumentative Essay Inflation. 12. Skein modules and noncommutative geometry , Texas Tech University, Lubbock, February 2000 (Colloquium talk). 13. Essay On Human Interaction. Skein modules and noncommutative geometry , Columbia University, New York, March 2000.

14. Allegiance Essay. The A-polynomial from the essay on human interaction, noncommutative viewpoint , Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, May 2001. 15. Development Of Women In India Essay. On the essay on human, quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on a surface , University of Texas at Dallas, October 2001. 16.

The Weyl quantization and essay the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on essay interaction a torus are the same , University of Notre Dame, March 2002. 17. The Weyl quantization and the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on a torus are the charles essays, same , University of South Alabama, Mobile, November 2002 (Colloquium talk). 18. The Weyl quantization and the quantum group quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on a torus are the same , University of on human interaction Wisconsin, Madison, November 2002. Pledge. 19. Knots and quantum physics , The Boeing Company, Seattle, March 2003. 20. Recursive relations for on human interaction, colored Jones polynomials , Indiana University, Bloomington, November 2003. 21.

Recursive relations for colored Jones polynomials , University of Texas at Dallas, January 2004 (Colloquium talk). 22. On the quantization of the moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus , Tata Institute for Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, June 2004 (Colloquium talk). 23. Some geometric aspects of quantum topology , Georgia Tech University, Atlanta, November 2004.

24. Computing the charles lamb of elia my relations, basis of a vector space arising in quantum physics , Indiana University, Bloomington, April 2005. 25. Interaction. The Jones polynomial and quantum mechanics , Boise State University, Boise, November 2006 (Colloquium talk). 26. Teoria espectral y la cuantizacion del espacio de moduli de conexiones planas en una superficie , CINVESTAV, Mexico City, March 2007. 27. Sobre la relacion entre la cuantizacion del espacio de moduli de conexiones planas de su(2) en una superficie y el functor modular , CINVESTAV, Mexico City, September 2007. 28. Development Of Women In India. Nudos y mecanica cuantica , Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Toluca, Mexico, September 2007. 29.

On knots and linear operators , University of Texas at San Antonio, April 2008. 30. Theta functions and knots , Yale University, New Haven, November 2009 (Colloquium talk). Essay On Human Interaction. 31. Theta functions and knots , University of Nevada at Reno, February 2010 (Colloquium talk). 32. Theta functions and shy seamus essay knots , Vassar College, October 2013 (Colloquium talk). 33.

Theta functions and knots , Central Connecticut State University, October 2014 (Colloquium talk). 34. Theta functions and knots , University of Michigan, November 2014 (Colloquium talk). Essay On Human Interaction. 35. Theta functions and in india knots , Universidade Federal de Fortaleza, Brazil, May 2015. 36.

Chern-Simons theory and essay interaction Weyl quantizations , Dartmouth College, September 2015 (Colloquium talk). 37. Chern-Simons theory and Weyl quantization , University of charles lamb essays of elia my relations Texas at Dallas, October 2015. 38. Theta functions and knots University of essay Texas at Dallas, April 2016 (Colloquium talk). Graduate Committee 2014-present. Undergraduate Committee, Texas Tech University, 2006-2008, 2010-2011.

Hiring Committee, Texas Tech University, 2010-2015. PhD Dissertation Committees of: Jeff Sink, University of Michigan 1999 Kendrick Smith, University of essays on competition or bad Michigan 2000 Todd Kennaugh, Texas Tech University, 2009 Jea-Pil Cho, Texas Tech University, 2012 (PhD advisor) Nadeeka De Silva, Texas Tech University, 2012 Elias Gonzalez, Texas Tech University, 2016. MS Dissertation Committee of: Jea-Pil Cho, Texas Tech University, 2010 (committee chair), Hongwei Want, Texas Tech University, 2015 (committee chair). Lale Asik, Texas Tech University, 2016. Committee for Mathematics Competitions, University of Michigan, 1999-2000. Organizer of the 8th Annual Red Raider Symposium - The Topology and Geometry of essay interaction Physics Conference , October 2008. Session organizer at the Sectional Meeting of the American Mathematical Society , April 11-13, 2014. Co-organizer of essays of elia 93rd Texas MAA Sectional Meeting , April 11-12, 2013.

Co-organizer of Texas Geometry and essay on human interaction Topology Conference , Spring 2002, Spring 2005, Spring 2008, Spring 2011, Spring 2014. Session organizer at the Sectional Meeting of the American Mathematical Society , April 22-23, 2006. Session organizer at allegiance essay, the Sectional Meeting of the American Mathematical Society , 8-10 April 2005. Co-organizer of the essay, Spring Topology and Dynamical Systems Conference , March 2003. ACTIVITIES RELATED TO MATHEMATICS COMPETITIONS. Deputy Leader of the US International Mathematical Olympiad Team, Madrid, Spain, 2008 (US ranked third), Cape Town, South Africa, 2015 (US ranked second), Hong Kong, China, 2016 (US ranked first). Leader of the US Team taking part in the Romanian Masters in Mathematics, Bucharest, Romania, 2011 (US ranked first), 2012 (US ranked third), 2013 (US ranked first), 2015 (US ranked second), 2016 (US ranked first). Member of the USA Mathematical Olympiad Subcommittee of the MAA, 2013-present. Member of the lamb of elia my relations, USA Mathematical Olympiad Advisory Panel, 1997-present. As such I propose problems for the USA Mathematical Olympiad. Coordinator of the grading , 40th International Mathematical Olympiad, Bucharest, Romania, 1999, and of the 42nd International Mathematical Olympiad, Washington, USA, 2001.

Advisor for the coordination of essay grading , 44th International Mathematical Olympiad, Tokyo, Japan, 2003. Coach of University of Michigan Putnam Team, 1998-1999. In 1998 the Michigan Team placed 14th among over statement engineering grad 200 teams. On Human. In 1999 the statement grad, Michigan Team was one of the 5 winners of the Putnam Competition, placing 4th. One of my students, Dapeng Zhu placed 16th. Coach of the Texas Tech University Putnam Team, 2000-present. Essay On Human Interaction. In 2000 one of the students, Jeremy Sain, placed 86th in the nation, and in 2001 he placed 78th in the nation.

Grader of the USA Mathematical Olympiad, 1997-2005, 2007-2009, 2013-present. Writer of the problems for the Konhauser Problem Fest, 2010, 2014. Coach of charles essays of elia my relations Jay Chung, a student at West High School, Iowa City, 1992-1995. Jay obtained a bronze medal at on human interaction, the International Mathematical Olympiad, Toronto, Canada, July 1995. Coach for mathematical competitions, employed by the Iowa City Community School District, 1992-1993. Editor of universo.math, 2014-present. Assistant Editor of Mathematics Magazine, 2002-2007. Associate Editor for Revista Matematica din Timisoara (Timisoara Mathematics Gazette), 1985-1989. Talks on mathematical Olympiads presented at. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, February 1998, Northeastern University, Boston, March 1999, Ft.

Lewis College, Durango, March 2002, University of South Alabama, Mobile, November 2002, C.D. Loga High School, Timisoara, December 2002, Texas Tech University Summer Math Academy, June 2006, June 2011, Texas Tech University Research Experience for Undergraduates, June 2007, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Toluca, September 2007, Mathematical Olympiad Training Program of the Estado de Mexico, September 2007, Dallas Metroplex Math Circle, November 2007, March 2009, January 2010, November 2010, November 2014, University of Texas at heaney, San Antonio, April 2008, Yale University, November 2009, Sistema Elite high school, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 2011, Etapa high school, São Paulo, Brazil, June 2013, Vassar College, October 2013, Central Connecticut State University, October 2014, Ari de Sa high school, Fortaleza, Brazil, May 2015, Undergraduate : Precalculus, Calculus I, Calculus II, Multivariable Calculus, Advanced Calculus I and on human II, Introduction to Differential Equations, Advanced Geometry, Linear Algebra, Math for Business Students, Problem Solving, Introduction to Topology, Number Theory for Teachers, Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning, Graduate: Topology, Real Analysis, Low Dimensional Topology, Functional Analysis, Quantum Mechanics. landscape photography (I love the personal statement, Southwest), tourism (as long as I organize everything myself), music (classical: instrumental and opera, ethnic: blues, latin, Romanian, etc), skiing (no bumps), snorkeling, kayaking, hiking, history of essay painting, indo-european languages, cooking, carpentry, gardening.

Custom Essay Writing Service -
Human Interaction Essay Examples | Kibin

Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. The balanced scorecard revolutionized conventional thinking about performance metrics. When Kaplan and Norton first introduced the concept, in essay on human interaction 1992, companies were busy transforming themselves to compete in the world of information; their ability to exploit intangible assets was becoming more decisive than their ability to manage physical assets. The scorecard allowed companies to track financial results while monitoring progress in statement building the capabilities needed for growth. The tool was not intended to be a replacement for financial measures but rather a complement—and that’s just how most companies treated it. Some companies went a step further, however, and discovered the on human interaction, scorecard’s value as the cornerstone of a new strategic management system. Essay On Grade Inflation. In this article from 1996, the authors describe how the balanced scorecard can address a serious deficiency in traditional management systems: the inability to link a company’s long-term strategy with its short-term financial goals.

The scorecard lets managers introduce four new processes that help companies make that important link. The first process— translating the vision —helps managers build a consensus concerning a company’s strategy and express it in terms that can guide action at the local level. The second— communicating and linking —calls for essay on human communicating a strategy at all levels of the organization and allegiance essay pledge, linking it with unit and individual goals. The third— business planning —enables companies to integrate their business plans with their financial plans. The fourth— feedback and learning —gives companies the capacity for essay on human interaction strategic learning, which consists of on competition good or bad, gathering feedback, testing the hypotheses on which a strategy is based, and making necessary adjustments. Why do budgets often bear little direct relation to a company’s long-term strategic objectives? Because they don’t take enough into essay consideration. A balanced scorecard augments traditional financial measures with benchmarks for performance in development of women in india essay three key nonfinancial areas: a company’s relationship with its customers its key internal processes its learning and growth. When performance measures for these areas are added to essay on human interaction the financial metrics, the result is not only a broader perspective on the company’s health and personal engineering, activities, it’s also a powerful organizing framework.

A sophisticated instrument panel for coordinating and fine-tuning a company’s operations and businesses so that all activities are aligned with its strategy. The Idea in Practice. The balanced scorecard relies on essay, four processes to bind short-term activities to long-term objectives: By relying on measurement, the scorecard forces managers to come to agreement on the metrics they will use to essays on competition good operationalize their lofty visions. Example: A bank had articulated its strategy as providing “superior service to on human targeted customers.” But the twice essay, process of choosing operational measures for the four areas of the scorecard made executives realize that they first needed to reconcile divergent views of who the targeted customers were and what constituted superior service. When a scorecard is disseminated up and down the organizational chart, strategy becomes a tool available to on human interaction everyone.

As the high-level scorecard cascades down to individual business units, overarching strategic objectives and or bad, measures are translated into interaction objectives and measures appropriate to each particular group. Tying these targets to individual performance and twice shy seamus essay, compensation systems yields “personal scorecards.” Thus, individual employees understand how their own productivity supports the overall strategy. Most companies have separate procedures (and sometimes units) for strategic planning and budgeting. Little wonder, then, that typical long-term planning is, in the words of essay, one executive, where “the rubber meets the sky.” The discipline of creating a balanced scorecard forces companies to integrate the two functions, thereby ensuring that financial budgets do indeed support strategic goals. After agreeing on performance measures for the four scorecard perspectives, companies identify the most influential “drivers” of the desired outcomes and then set milestones for gauging the progress they make with these drivers.

By supplying a mechanism for strategic feedback and review, the balanced scorecard helps an organization foster a kind of charles lamb, learning often missing in companies: the ability to essay on human interaction reflect on inferences and adjust theories about cause-and-effect relationships. Feedback about products and services. New learning about key internal processes. Technological discoveries. All this information can be fed into the scorecard, enabling strategic refinements to be made continually. Thus, at essays good any point in the implementation, managers can know whether the strategy is working—and if not, why. As companies around the world transform themselves for competition that is based on information, their ability to exploit intangible assets has become far more decisive than their ability to invest in and manage physical assets. Essay On Human Interaction. Several years ago, in personal statement engineering recognition of this change, we introduced a concept we called the balanced scorecard . The balanced scorecard supplemented traditional financial measures with criteria that measured performance from three additional perspectives—those of customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth. (See the exhibit “Translating Vision and Strategy: Four Perspectives.”) It therefore enabled companies to track financial results while simultaneously monitoring progress in building the capabilities and acquiring the essay interaction, intangible assets they would need for future growth. The scorecard wasn’t a replacement for financial measures; it was their complement. Recently, we have seen some companies move beyond our early vision for the scorecard to discover its value as the cornerstone of a new strategic management system.

Used this way, the scorecard addresses a serious deficiency in or bad traditional management systems: their inability to on human interaction link a company’s long-term strategy with its short-term actions. Most companies’ operational and management control systems are built around financial measures and targets, which bear little relation to pledge the company’s progress in achieving long-term strategic objectives. Essay Interaction. Thus the emphasis most companies place on short-term financial measures leaves a gap between the development of women, development of a strategy and essay on human interaction, its implementation. Managers using the essays my relations, balanced scorecard do not have to rely on short-term financial measures as the sole indicators of the company’s performance. The scorecard lets them introduce four new management processes that, separately and in combination, contribute to linking long-term strategic objectives with short-term actions. (See the exhibit “Managing Strategy: Four Processes.”) The first new process— translating the vision —helps managers build a consensus around the essay interaction, organization’s vision and strategy. Despite the best intentions of those at the top, lofty statements about essay on grade, becoming “best in essay class,” “the number one supplier,” or an “empowered organization” don’t translate easily into operational terms that provide useful guides to action at the local level. For people to act on the words in vision and strategy statements, those statements must be expressed as an integrated set of objectives and measures, agreed upon by charles lamb my relations, all senior executives, that describe the long-term drivers of success. The second process— communicating and essay interaction, linking —lets managers communicate their strategy up and down the organization and link it to departmental and essay on grade inflation, individual objectives. Traditionally, departments are evaluated by their financial performance, and individual incentives are tied to short-term financial goals. Essay Interaction. The scorecard gives managers a way of ensuring that all levels of the organization understand the long-term strategy and that both departmental and allegiance, individual objectives are aligned with it.

The third process— business planning —enables companies to integrate their business and financial plans. Almost all organizations today are implementing a variety of interaction, change programs, each with its own champions, gurus, and consultants, and development of women in india, each competing for on human interaction senior executives’ time, energy, and resources. Managers find it difficult to integrate those diverse initiatives to achieve their strategic goals—a situation that leads to frequent disappointments with the on grade, programs’ results. But when managers use the ambitious goals set for balanced scorecard measures as the basis for allocating resources and setting priorities, they can undertake and interaction, coordinate only those initiatives that move them toward their long-term strategic objectives. The fourth process— feedback and learning —gives companies the capacity for what we call strategic learning. Existing feedback and of women in india essay, review processes focus on whether the company, its departments, or its individual employees have met their budgeted financial goals. With the on human interaction, balanced scorecard at the center of its management systems, a company can monitor short-term results from the three additional perspectives—customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth—and evaluate strategy in the light of recent performance.

The scorecard thus enables companies to modify strategies to reflect real-time learning. None of the more than 100 organizations that we have studied or with which we have worked implemented their first balanced scorecard with the intention of developing a new strategic management system. Allegiance Essay. But in essay interaction each one, the senior executives discovered that the scorecard supplied a framework and thus a focus for many critical management processes: departmental and individual goal setting, business planning, capital allocations, strategic initiatives, and feedback and learning. Previously, those processes were uncoordinated and often directed at essay short-term operational goals. On Human Interaction. By building the development, scorecard, the senior executives started a process of change that has gone well beyond the original idea of simply broadening the essay, company’s performance measures. For example, one insurance company—let’s call it National Insurance—developed its first balanced scorecard to create a new vision for itself as an underwriting specialist. But once National started to use it, the scorecard allowed the CEO and the senior management team not only to introduce a new strategy for on grade the organization but also to overhaul the company’s management system. On Human. The CEO subsequently told employees in a letter addressed to the whole organization that National would thenceforth use the personal statement engineering grad school, balanced scorecard and the philosophy that it represented to manage the business. National built its new strategic management system step-by-step over 30 months, with each step representing an incremental improvement. (See the exhibit “How One Company Built a Strategic Management System…”) The iterative sequence of actions enabled the company to reconsider each of the four new management processes two or three times before the system stabilized and became an established part of National’s overall management system.

Thus the CEO was able to transform the company so that everyone could focus on essay interaction, achieving long-term strategic objectives—something that no purely financial framework could do. The CEO of an argumentative essay engineering construction company, after working with his senior management team for several months to develop a mission statement, got a phone call from a project manager in the field. “I want you to know,” the distraught manager said, “that I believe in essay on human the mission statement. I want to engineering school act in accordance with the mission statement. I’m here with my customer. What am I supposed to do?”

The mission statement, like those of interaction, many other organizations, had declared an intention to “use high-quality employees to provide services that surpass customers’ needs.” But the project manager in the field with his employees and his customer did not know how to translate those words into the appropriate actions. The phone call convinced the CEO that a large gap existed between the mission statement and employees’ knowledge of how their day-to-day actions could contribute to realizing the company’s vision. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Metro Bank (not its real name), the result of grad school, a merger of essay on human interaction, two competitors, encountered a similar gap while building its balanced scorecard. The senior executive group thought it had reached agreement on the new organization’s overall strategy: “to provide superior service to targeted customers.” Research had revealed five basic market segments among existing and potential customers, each with different needs. While formulating the measures for the customer-perspective portion of their balanced scorecard, however, it became apparent that although the 25 senior executives agreed on the words of the strategy, each one had a different definition of superior service and a different image of the targeted customers . The exercise of good, developing operational measures for the four perspectives on the bank’s scorecard forced the 25 executives to clarify the meaning of the essay on human interaction, strategy statement. Ultimately, they agreed to essays on competition or bad stimulate revenue growth through new products and services and also agreed on on human interaction, the three most desirable customer segments. They developed scorecard measures for the specific products and services that should be delivered to development in india customers in the targeted segments as well as for the relationship the bank should build with customers in each segment. The scorecard also highlighted gaps in employees’ skills and in information systems that the bank would have to close in essay interaction order to deliver the selected value propositions to the targeted customers.

Thus, creating a balanced scorecard forced the bank’s senior managers to arrive at a consensus and then to translate their vision into terms that had meaning to personal engineering grad school the people who would realize the vision. “The top ten people in the business now understand the strategy better than ever before. It’s too bad,” a senior executive of essay interaction, a major oil company complained, “that we can’t put this in a bottle so that everyone could share it.” With the balanced scorecard, he can. One company we have worked with deliberately involved three layers of management in the creation of its balanced scorecard. The senior executive group formulated the financial and customer objectives. Essays On Competition. It then mobilized the talent and essay on human, information in development of women the next two levels of essay, managers by having them formulate the internal-business-process and learning-and-growth objectives that would drive the essays good, achievement of the financial and customer goals. For example, knowing the importance of satisfying customers’ expectations of interaction, on-time delivery, the shy seamus heaney, broader group identified several internal business processes—such as order processing, scheduling, and fulfillment—in which the company had to excel. To do so, the company would have to retrain frontline employees and improve the information systems available to them.

The group developed performance measures for those critical processes and for staff and systems capabilities. Broad participation in creating a scorecard takes longer, but it offers several advantages: Information from a larger number of managers is incorporated into the internal objectives; the managers gain a better understanding of the company’s long-term strategic goals; and such broad participation builds a stronger commitment to essay interaction achieving those goals. But getting managers to on competition or bad buy into the scorecard is only a first step in linking individual actions to on human interaction corporate goals. The balanced scorecard signals to shy seamus everyone what the organization is trying to achieve for shareholders and customers alike. But to align employees’ individual performances with the overall strategy, scorecard users generally engage in three activities: communicating and educating, setting goals, and linking rewards to performance measures. Implementing a strategy begins with educating those who have to execute it. Whereas some organizations opt to hold their strategy close to the vest, most believe that they should disseminate it from top to essay on human bottom. Essay Inflation. A broad-based communication program shares with all employees the strategy and the critical objectives they have to meet if the strategy is to succeed.

Onetime events such as the distribution of interaction, brochures or newsletters and the holding of “town meetings” might kick off the program. Some organizations post bulletin boards that illustrate and explain the balanced scorecard measures, then update them with monthly results. Others use groupware and electronic bulletin boards to distribute the scorecard to the desktops of all employees and to encourage dialogue about the measures. The same media allow employees to make suggestions for essay achieving or exceeding the targets. The balanced scorecard, as the embodiment of business unit strategy, should also be communicated upward in the organization—to corporate headquarters and to on human interaction the corporate board of pledge, directors. With the scorecard, business units can quantify and communicate their long-term strategies to essay senior executives using a comprehensive set of linked financial and nonfinancial measures. Such communication informs the executives and the board in argumentative essay on grade specific terms that long-term strategies designed for competitive success are in place.

The measures also provide the basis for feedback and accountability. Meeting short-term financial targets should not constitute satisfactory performance when other measures indicate that the long-term strategy is interaction either not working or not being implemented well. Should the balanced scorecard be communicated beyond the boardroom to statement grad school external shareholders? We believe that as senior executives gain confidence in the ability of the scorecard measures to monitor strategic performance and predict future financial performance, they will find ways to inform outside investors about those measures without disclosing competitively sensitive information. Skandia, an insurance and essay on human, financial services company based in Sweden, issues a supplement to its annual report called “The Business Navigator”—“an instrument to help us navigate into the future and thereby stimulate renewal and development.” The supplement describes Skandia’s strategy and the strategic measures the company uses to communicate and evaluate the strategy.

It also provides a report on the company’s performance along those measures during the year. The measures are customized for each operating unit and include, for example, market share, customer satisfaction and retention, employee competence, employee empowerment, and technology deployment. Communicating the balanced scorecard promotes commitment and argumentative essay on grade inflation, accountability to the business’s long-term strategy. As one executive at on human Metro Bank declared, “The balanced scorecard is both motivating and obligating.” Mere awareness of essay pledge, corporate goals, however, is essay not enough to change many people’s behavior. Somehow, the organization’s high-level strategic objectives and measures must be translated into objectives and measures for operating units and individuals. The exploration group of a large oil company developed a technique to enable and encourage individuals to set goals for themselves that were consistent with the organization’s.

It created a small, fold-up, personal scorecard that people could carry in their shirt pockets or wallets. (See the on competition good or bad, exhibit “The Personal Scorecard.”) The scorecard contains three levels of information. The first describes corporate objectives, measures, and targets. The second leaves room for translating corporate targets into targets for each business unit. For the third level, the company asks both individuals and teams to articulate which of on human, their own objectives would be consistent with the essay, business unit and corporate objectives, as well as what initiatives they would take to achieve their objectives. It also asks them to define up to five performance measures for their objectives and to set targets for each measure.

The personal scorecard helps to communicate corporate and business unit objectives to the people and teams performing the work, enabling them to translate the objectives into meaningful tasks and on human, targets for themselves. It also lets them keep that information close at hand—in their pockets. Linking rewards to performance measures. Should compensation systems be linked to balanced scorecard measures? Some companies, believing that tying financial compensation to performance is a powerful lever, have moved quickly to establish such a linkage. For example, an oil company that we’ll call Pioneer Petroleum uses its scorecard as the sole basis for computing incentive compensation.

The company ties 60% of its executives’ bonuses to their achievement of ambitious targets for a weighted average of four financial indicators: return on grad, capital, profitability, cash flow, and essay on human, operating cost. It bases the remaining 40% on indicators of good, customer satisfaction, dealer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and on human, environmental responsibility (such as a percentage change in the level of emissions to water and air). Pioneer’s CEO says that linking compensation to the scorecard has helped to align the company with its strategy. Of Elia. “I know of no competitor,” he says, “who has this degree of on human, alignment. It is producing results for us.” As attractive and grad, as powerful as such linkage is, it nonetheless carries risks. For instance, does the company have the right measures on the scorecard? Does it have valid and reliable data for the selected measures?

Could unintended or unexpected consequences arise from the way the targets for the measures are achieved? Those are questions that companies should ask. Furthermore, companies traditionally handle multiple objectives in essay interaction a compensation formula by of women in india, assigning weights to each objective and calculating incentive compensation by the extent to which each weighted objective was achieved. This practice permits substantial incentive compensation to be paid if the business unit overachieves on a few objectives even if it falls far short on others. On Human Interaction. A better approach would be to establish minimum threshold levels for a critical subset of the strategic measures. Individuals would earn no incentive compensation if performance in a given period fell short of any threshold. This requirement should motivate people to achieve a more balanced performance across short- and long-term objectives. Some organizations, however, have reduced their emphasis on allegiance, short-term, formula-based incentive systems as a result of introducing the balanced scorecard.

They have discovered that dialogue among executives and essay on human, managers about the scorecard—both the formulation of the measures and objectives and the explanation of actual versus targeted results—provides a better opportunity to observe managers’ performance and abilities. Increased knowledge of their managers’ abilities makes it easier for executives to set incentive rewards subjectively and to allegiance essay defend those subjective evaluations—a process that is less susceptible to the game playing and on human interaction, distortions associated with explicit, formula-based rules. One company we have studied takes an intermediate position. It bases bonuses for business unit managers on two equally weighted criteria: their achievement of a financial objective—economic value added—over a three-year period and a subjective assessment of their performance on measures drawn from the engineering grad school, customer, internal-business-process, and learning-and-growth perspectives of the balanced scorecard. That the balanced scorecard has a role to play in the determination of essay interaction, incentive compensation is not in doubt. Precisely what that role should be will become clearer as more companies experiment with linking rewards to scorecard measures. “Where the argumentative on grade, rubber meets the essay on human interaction, sky”: That’s how one senior executive describes his company’s long-range-planning process. He might have said the same of many other companies because their financially based management systems fail to link change programs and resource allocation to long-term strategic priorities.

The problem is that most organizations have separate procedures and organizational units for strategic planning and for resource allocation and budgeting. To formulate their strategic plans, senior executives go off-site annually and engage for several days in active discussions facilitated by senior planning and development managers or external consultants. The outcome of this exercise is on competition good a strategic plan articulating where the on human, company expects (or hopes or prays) to be in three, five, and essays on competition good or bad, ten years. Typically, such plans then sit on executives’ bookshelves for the next 12 months. Meanwhile, a separate resource-allocation and budgeting process run by the finance staff sets financial targets for revenues, expenses, profits, and investments for the next fiscal year. The budget it produces consists almost entirely of financial numbers that generally bear little relation to the targets in the strategic plan.

Which document do corporate managers discuss in their monthly and essay, quarterly meetings during the following year? Usually only the budget, because the essays on competition good or bad, periodic reviews focus on a comparison of actual and budgeted results for every line item. When is the strategic plan next discussed? Probably during the next annual off-site meeting, when the senior managers draw up a new set of three-, five-, and ten-year plans. The very exercise of creating a balanced scorecard forces companies to essay interaction integrate their strategic planning and budgeting processes and therefore helps to ensure that their budgets support their strategies. Scorecard users select measures of progress from all four scorecard perspectives and set targets for each of them. Lamb. Then they determine which actions will drive them toward their targets, identify the measures they will apply to those drivers from the four perspectives, and establish the short-term milestones that will mark their progress along the strategic paths they have selected. Building a scorecard thus enables a company to link its financial budgets with its strategic goals. For example, one division of the essay on human interaction, Style Company (not its real name) committed to achieving a seemingly impossible goal articulated by the CEO: to double revenues in five years. The forecasts built into the organization’s existing strategic plan fell $1 billion short of charles lamb my relations, this objective.

The division’s managers, after considering various scenarios, agreed to specific increases in five different performance drivers: the number of new stores opened, the number of new customers attracted into new and existing stores, the percentage of shoppers in each store converted into on human actual purchasers, the portion of existing customers retained, and average sales per customer. By helping to define the key drivers of revenue growth and by committing to argumentative on grade targets for each of essay, them, the division’s managers eventually grew comfortable with the CEO’s ambitious goal. The process of building a balanced scorecard—clarifying the strategic objectives and then identifying the few critical drivers—also creates a framework for managing an organization’s various change programs. These initiatives—reengineering, employee empowerment, time-based management, and total quality management, among others—promise to deliver results but also compete with one another for scarce resources, including the scarcest resource of all: senior managers’ time and attention. Shortly after the merger that created it, Metro Bank, for on competition good example, launched more than 70 different initiatives. The initiatives were intended to produce a more competitive and successful institution, but they were inadequately integrated into on human interaction the overall strategy. After building their balanced scorecard, Metro Bank’s managers dropped many of those programs—such as a marketing effort directed at individuals with very high net worth—and consolidated others into initiatives that were better aligned with the personal school, company’s strategic objectives. For example, the managers replaced a program aimed at enhancing existing low-level selling skills with a major initiative aimed at on human retraining salespersons to become trusted financial advisers, capable of selling a broad range of newly introduced products to the three selected customer segments. The bank made both changes because the scorecard enabled it to gain a better understanding of the programs required to achieve its strategic objectives.

Once the strategy is defined and essays on competition, the drivers are identified, the scorecard influences managers to concentrate on essay on human, improving or reengineering those processes most critical to the organization’s strategic success. That is how the allegiance pledge, scorecard most clearly links and aligns action with strategy. The final step in linking strategy to actions is to establish specific short-term targets, or milestones, for the balanced scorecard measures. Milestones are tangible expressions of essay on human interaction, managers’ beliefs about when and to what degree their current programs will affect those measures. Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. In establishing milestones, managers are expanding the traditional budgeting process to lamb of elia incorporate strategic as well as financial goals. Detailed financial planning remains important, but financial goals taken by themselves ignore the three other balanced scorecard perspectives. In an essay on human integrated planning and budgeting process, executives continue to budget for statement engineering grad school short-term financial performance, but they also introduce short-term targets for essay measures in the customer, internal-business-process, and development in india, learning-and-growth perspectives. With those milestones established, managers can continually test both the theory underlying the strategy and essay on human interaction, the strategy’s implementation.

At the development of women in india essay, end of the business-planning process, managers should have set targets for the long-term objectives they would like to achieve in on human all four scorecard perspectives; they should have identified the strategic initiatives required and essay pledge, allocated the necessary resources to those initiatives; and they should have established milestones for the measures that mark progress toward achieving their strategic goals. “With the balanced scorecard,” a CEO of an engineering company told us, “I can continually test my strategy. Essay. It’s like performing real-time research.” That is exactly the capability that the scorecard should give senior managers: the ability to know at any point in its implementation whether the strategy they have formulated is, in essay fact, working, and if not, why. The first three management processes—translating the vision, communicating and linking, and business planning—are vital for implementing strategy, but they are not sufficient in essay on human an unpredictable world. Together they form an important single-loop-learning process—single-loop in the sense that the objective remains constant, and argumentative, any departure from the planned trajectory is seen as a defect to essay on human be remedied. This single-loop process does not require or even facilitate reexamination of either the strategy or the techniques used to implement it in charles my relations light of current conditions. Most companies today operate in a turbulent environment with complex strategies that, though valid when they were launched, may lose their validity as business conditions change. In this kind of environment, where new threats and opportunities arise constantly, companies must become capable of what Chris Argyris calls double-loop learning —learning that produces a change in people’s assumptions and theories about cause-and-effect relationships. (See “Teaching Smart People How to Learn,” HBR May–June 1991.) Budget reviews and other financially based management tools cannot engage senior executives in double-loop learning—first, because these tools address performance from essay only one perspective, and second, because they don’t involve strategic learning. Strategic learning consists of gathering feedback, testing the hypotheses on which strategy was based, and making the necessary adjustments. The balanced scorecard supplies three elements that are essential to strategic learning.

First, it articulates the company’s shared vision, defining in clear and operational terms the results that the company, as a team, is personal engineering grad trying to achieve. The scorecard communicates a holistic model that links individual efforts and accomplishments to business unit objectives. Second, the scorecard supplies the interaction, essential strategic feedback system. A business strategy can be viewed as a set of hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships. A strategic feedback system should be able to shy seamus heaney test, validate, and essay, modify the hypotheses embedded in essays on competition a business unit’s strategy. By establishing short-term goals, or milestones, within the business-planning process, executives are forecasting the relationship between changes in performance drivers and the associated changes in one or more specified goals. For example, executives at Metro Bank estimated the on human interaction, amount of time it would take for improvements in training and in the availability of information systems before employees could sell multiple financial products effectively to existing and new customers. They also estimated how great the effect of that selling capability would be. Another organization attempted to validate its hypothesized cause-and-effect relationships in the balanced scorecard by measuring the strength of the linkages among measures in argumentative essay inflation the different perspectives. (See the exhibit “How One Company Linked Measures from the Four Perspectives.”) The company found significant correlations between employees’ morale, a measure in the learning-and-growth perspective, and customer satisfaction, an important customer perspective measure. Customer satisfaction, in turn, was correlated with faster payment of invoices—a relationship that led to a substantial reduction in accounts receivable and hence a higher return on on human, capital employed. The company also found correlations between employees’ morale and the number of personal engineering, suggestions made by employees (two learning-and-growth measures) as well as between an increased number of essay on human interaction, suggestions and lower rework (an internal-business-process measure).

Evidence of such strong correlations help to confirm the organization’s business strategy. If, however, the expected correlations are not found over twice shy seamus essay, time, it should be an indication to executives that the theory underlying the unit’s strategy may not be working as they had anticipated. Especially in large organizations, accumulating sufficient data to essay on human interaction document significant correlations and causation among balanced scorecard measures can take a long time—months or years. Over the short term, managers’ assessment of twice shy seamus heaney essay, strategic impact may have to rest on subjective and qualitative judgments. Eventually, however, as more evidence accumulates, organizations may be able to provide more objectively grounded estimates of cause-and-effect relationships. But just getting managers to essay on human interaction think systematically about the assumptions underlying their strategy is an improvement over the current practice of making decisions based on short-term operational results.

Third, the in india essay, scorecard facilitates the strategy review that is essential to strategic learning. Traditionally, companies use the monthly or quarterly meetings between corporate and division executives to analyze the most recent period’s financial results. Discussions focus on essay on human interaction, past performance and on explanations of good or bad, why financial objectives were not achieved. The balanced scorecard, with its specification of the causal relationships between performance drivers and objectives, allows corporate and essay interaction, business unit executives to use their periodic review sessions to evaluate the validity of the unit’s strategy and the quality of its execution. If the unit’s employees and managers have delivered on the performance drivers (retraining of employees, availability of in india essay, information systems, and new financial products and services, for instance), then their failure to achieve the expected outcomes (higher sales to targeted customers, for example) signals that the theory underlying the strategy may not be valid. The disappointing sales figures are an early warning. Managers should take such disconfirming evidence seriously and on human, reconsider their shared conclusions about market conditions, customer value propositions, competitors’ behavior, and allegiance essay, internal capabilities.

The result of such a review may be a decision to essay reaffirm their belief in essay the current strategy but to adjust the quantitative relationship among the strategic measures on the balanced scorecard. But they also might conclude that the unit needs a different strategy (an example of double-loop learning) in light of essay, new knowledge about essays or bad, market conditions and on human interaction, internal capabilities. In any case, the scorecard will have stimulated key executives to learn about the viability of their strategy. This capacity for enabling organizational learning at the executive level—strategic learning—is what distinguishes the balanced scorecard, making it invaluable for those who wish to create a strategic management system. Toward a New Strategic Management System.

Many companies adopted early balanced scorecard concepts to improve their performance measurement systems. They achieved tangible but narrow results. Pledge. Adopting those concepts provided clarification, consensus, and focus on the desired improvements in performance. More recently, we have seen companies expand their use of the balanced scorecard, employing it as the foundation of an integrated and iterative strategic management system. Essay. Companies are using the scorecard to. clarify and update strategy; communicate strategy throughout the company; align unit and individual goals with the strategy; link strategic objectives to long-term targets and annual budgets; identify and align strategic initiatives; and conduct periodic performance reviews to learn about and improve strategy.

The balanced scorecard enables a company to argumentative essay on grade inflation align its management processes and focuses the on human, entire organization on implementing long-term strategy. Engineering School. At National Insurance, the scorecard provided the CEO and his managers with a central framework around which they could redesign each piece of the company’s management system. And because of the essay interaction, cause-and-effect linkages inherent in essay the scorecard framework, changes in one component of the system reinforced earlier changes made elsewhere. Therefore, every change made over essay on human interaction, the 30-month period added to the momentum that kept the charles lamb of elia, organization moving forward in the agreed-upon direction. Without a balanced scorecard, most organizations are unable to achieve a similar consistency of vision and action as they attempt to change direction and introduce new strategies and processes. The balanced scorecard provides a framework for managing the on human interaction, implementation of strategy while also allowing the strategy itself to evolve in response to changes in the company’s competitive, market, and technological environments.

Robert S. Twice Shy Seamus Heaney. Kaplan is a senior fellow and the Marvin Bower Professor of Leadership Development, Emeritus, at Harvard Business School. He is a coauthor, with Michael E. Porter, of “How to Solve the Cost Crisis in Health Care” (HBR, September 2011). David P. On Human Interaction. Norton is a founder and essay on grade inflation, director of the essay on human, Palladium Group and statement school, is co-author of essay on human, The Balanced Scorecard .

Write My Essays Today -
Basic Concepts Of Human Interaction Essay - 632 Words - brightkite com

agnostic essay Sanctimonious Fence Sitters. Essay Interaction? Have agnostics found the allegiance essay, best way to interaction, describe how we should tackle religious belief? In today's scientific world is becoming an agnostic the intellectually honest stance that we should all be adopting? In this essay we will show that agnosticism as adopted by the layperson is a false belief. It is based on a corrupted understanding of what agnosticism actually means. We will show that many are deluded when they profess to allegiance essay pledge, being an agnostic and on human interaction that others use the tag solely to deceive. We will also demonstrate that a great many agnostics are actually closet Christians. I'm not an allegiance atheist.

I'm an agnostic. The above is a quote from NZ Prime Minister Helen Clark and was widely reported in the media. Ms Clark makes no secret of the fact that she sees herself as an essay interaction agnostic. Religious commentator Ian Harris in his column Honest to God tells us that Ms Clark was also once asked: Do you believe Jesus Christ is the son of God? She evidently replied, I have no religious convictions. I respect those that do. Charles Lamb Essays Of Elia? I have no opinion to offer. I'm an agnostic.

This essay is not about Ms Clark but her comments are representative of agnostics in general and will serve as an introduction. Interaction? Mr Harris goes on to state: Agnostics, in contrast to development essay, atheists, do not deny flatly the existence of God, or that supernatural forces play any part in the universe, but do not affirm them either. Essay On Human Interaction? They leave the question open: such matters can never be finally known, so why bother? Many people share this view. But what do these statements really tell us about Ms Clark, her view of God and agnostics? Contrary to what we suspect she intended to convey with her I'm not an atheist.

I'm an agnostic statement, which was simply to essays on competition or bad, hide any suggestion that she was an essay on human interaction atheist, something it doesn't pay to admit to if you're a politician, it actually translates to, 'I believe in God, although I don't think we can ever prove that he exists'. Does Helen Clark really have a belief in God? We don't think she does, but in effect that is what she did by denying being an atheist and instead labeling herself an essays of elia agnostic. Why? Well if you're not an on human interaction atheist then you're a theist, a believer in god. If a human says, I'm not a female , then logically they must be a male since there are only two options. However many people believe that along with theists and charles lamb essays of elia my relations atheists we have a third option agnostics. And obviously Ms Clark is essay on human interaction, one of these. So why when we talk about a belief in God or gods do we believe we only have two options, theists and atheists? Why aren't agnostics a third option?

Let's start with theists. A theist is someone who believes in theism, which according to allegiance, my dictionary is: Theism. On Human Interaction? Belief in the existence of a god or gods, especially belief in a personal God as creator and ruler of the development in india essay, world. [1] Put simply, a theist is anyone who has a belief in God or gods. A theist is a believer. Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Jews etc are all theists. Interaction? This is not a familiar term because people normally want to or bad, express more than the simple fact that they believe in on human, God, they want you to know exactly what God they believe in, thus they specify Christian or Muslim for example. Before we go further we better define exactly what that above definition means by the words God or gods. My dictionary defines god as follows: God . Allegiance Pledge? A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of on human interaction, faith and worship in in india, monotheistic religions. A being of supernatural powers or attributes, believed in and worshiped by a people, especially a male deity thought to control some part of essay, nature or reality. [1] So if a theist is argumentative, anyone who has a belief in God or gods a believer then what is on human interaction, someone who's not a theist, not a believer, what are they called?

What is the simple term that describes someone without a belief in development of women in india essay, God or gods? Surprising as it may seem to many, that term is atheist . We say surprising because while atheist is a far more familiar term than theist, many use it incorrectly. You may have noticed that the word atheist is simply theist with the essay, letter a stuck in front. The prefix a means without and modifies the charles essays of elia my relations, word that follows. For example you have amoral, meaning without morals. Remember that theism means a belief in essay on human, God or gods , therefore a-theism simply means without a belief in God or gods. Thus a theist is a believer and an atheist is a non-believer. Quite simple really. You only have two options theist or atheist, believer or non-believer. As much as many people hate to argumentative essay inflation, admit it, Christians especially, all babies are atheists.

The same with certain aliens from outer space or some isolated primitive tribe in some rainforest. This is on human interaction, because anyone that has no concept of gods obviously can't have a belief in gods (in the same way that our primitive natives have no belief in essays or bad, Einstein's 'Theory of Relativity' simply because they have no concept of essay, Einstein's 'Theory of on grade, Relativity'). You can't believe in something that you have no concept of. On Human? Thus, if they don't have a belief in god, they're atheists. That's not to say that once you explain the concept of god to them they won't immediately become believers, but until they do, they're atheists.

Technically your cat is an atheist. If you're not a theist, that only leaves one option you're an atheist. Statement Grad School? A rejection of theism leaves no other conclusion. It's like the phrase dead or alive, on or off or the on human, word pregnant. You are either one or the other. Either dead or alive, on or off, pregnant or not pregnant, there is no middle option.

No doubt some will claim that we have given too broad a definition of atheism, one that only appears to pledge, provide two options. This is because a large proportion of the population, especially those of essay on human interaction, a religious persuasion, believe that atheism really means: The belief that God or gods do not exist. Lamb Of Elia? Unfortunately a large proportion of the population are mistaken. It is true that many atheists do have this belief, including myself, but this is merely an extra belief that some atheists hold, not a definition of atheism itself. For example many scientists are physicists but this doesn't mean that all scientists are physicists. You need to essay, think of atheism as a broad spectrum, with one basic definition applying to all atheists that is, someone without a belief in god or gods . At one end of this spectrum are some atheists who have added to statement engineering, this basic view with the positive assertion that there are no gods . At the other end of essay, this spectrum are atheists who do not make this extra claim. They are known as 'implicit' or 'weak' atheists, those at the other end are known as 'explicit' or 'strong' atheists. And of heaney essay, course you have a big range in between. The same spectrum analogy can of course be applied to essay interaction, theism, with 'weak' theism and of elia my relations 'weak' atheism forming the boundary between the two. A 'weak' theist could be a young child who has been given just the vaguest suggestion of essay interaction, God, believing in God in the same way she believes in the Tooth Fairy.

While every theist from engineering school 'weak' to 'strong' believes God does exist (it's their strength of interaction, belief that varies), remember though that not every atheist believes that God doesn't exist. It's important to note that the argumentative on grade inflation, continuum that exists between 'weak' and 'strong' does not extend across the boundary where 'weak' theism and 'weak' atheism meet (at the centre of our diagram.) Theism and atheism are discrete states. Think of changing states as a quantum leap, you can be on either side of this boundary but you can't be on interaction, the boundary itself. Like electron orbits and personal statement engineering grad school energy states you are one or the essay on human, other, but you do not traverse slowly between states. There is personal, no continuum between the essay interaction, states.

Once you leave one state you instantaneously appear in the other, there is no stopover for refreshments and reflection. For example babies, aliens, primitive natives etc, anyone that has no concept of gods, are 'weak' atheists. They have no belief in god simply because they have no concept of grad school, god. They don't claim God doesn't exist because they have no idea what God is. Essay On Human Interaction? (Admittedly most primitive natives do have a concept of, and a belief in gods, but not all do. We're referring to a theoretically possible group of natives.) Move towards the middle of the spectrum and you have atheists who definitely understand the concept of gods but quickly decide that they don't believe in them. They can seldom provide good arguments as to why they don't believe, they simply don't. This is similar to people that don't believe in ESP or those that vote for a particular political party or against genetic engineering but can seldom explain why. At the other end you have the 'strong' atheists, and development essay these are the atheists that many people incorrectly use to define atheism. Essay On Human? These are atheists that have seriously considered the arguments and evidence for and against essay inflation the existence of gods and have decided that, in addition to essay on human, having no belief in gods, they now also believe that gods do not exist. Shy Seamus Essay? (Note that they do not say that they can prove that gods do not exist.

More on that shortly.) Many people answer this with the argument that the belief that God does not exist is basically the essay on human interaction, same as without a belief in God and we're merely being pedantic. However it is easy to twice, demonstrate how wrong this view is. Look at the following two statements regarding atheism: I have a belief that gods do not exist (strong atheism) I am without a belief in gods (basic atheism) Now let's put these statements into everyday terms by replacing gods with aliens: I have a belief that aliens do not exist. I am without a belief in essay on human interaction, aliens Many people would state that they're not convinced that aliens exist elsewhere in the universe because they haven't seen any good evidence that they do.

At the essays on competition good or bad, same time many of these people would add that this doesn't mean they do not exist. Essay Interaction? They may exist, we just haven't seen them. If they turn up tomorrow we'll start believing in them. This group would subscribe to the second claim: I am without a belief in aliens (for the moment) . Essay? Another group would subscribe to essay interaction, both claims: I am without a belief in aliens because I believe aliens do not exist . They would claim that we haven't seen any aliens for twice shy seamus heaney essay the simple reason that they don't exist, in the same way that we haven't seen any real Easter Bunnies. So it should be clear that both statements do not imply the same meaning. On Human? Thus 'explicit' or 'strong' atheism is merely one type of atheism. Grad School? Claiming that the belief that gods do not exist is the real definition of essay on human interaction, atheism is as silly as claiming that belief in essays or bad, Jesus Christ is the real definition of religion. Others would correctly state that this is only one type of atheism and one type of religion. Essay Interaction? Unfortunately many people define all atheists as 'strong' atheists and all religious believers as 'Christians'. This is mainly because we only see outspoken people in charles lamb essays my relations, the media etc. 'Weak' or 'middle-of-the-road' atheists and religious types can never be bothered to speak out on things they know or care little about. So what can we conclude from this discussion?

First, there are only two possibilities when it comes to describing belief in God theism and atheism. Essay On Human Interaction? If someone is asked the question, Do you believe God exists? and they reply, Yes , then they are a theist, regardless of shy seamus, how strong that belief is. Essay On Human Interaction? Anyone that can't honestly answer, Yes, I believe God exists , is essay, obviously without a belief in God and on human interaction is therefore an atheist. They may only on grade inflation be a hair's-breadth away from believing in God, but until they make that leap of conviction they will remain an atheist. As much as they may hate or fear or abhor the idea of being called an atheist, that is what they are.

Their denial does not change this fact, nor does calling themselves an agnostic. Any theist that gives up belief in essay on human, God immediately becomes an atheist and vice versa. Lamb Essays Of Elia? There is essay, no holding pattern, no mythical land called Agnosticism that one must cross between theism and atheism. Allegiance Essay Pledge? Yet agnostics claim that God may or may not exist, but we'll never know for essay sure, so refuse to lamb of elia my relations, commit one way or the essay on human, other. For this very reason agnostics won't admit to a belief in God. The very fact that they will not admit to a belief in God, regardless of development, their reasons, means they're not theists.

Therefore they're atheists. So where does this leave agnostics? Out in on human interaction, the cold actually. There just isn't anywhere for agnostics to fit in shy seamus heaney, the belief spectrum. Does all this mean that agnosticism is a bogus term? No, only that, like atheism, it's being used incorrectly. Let's look at the dictionary definition: Agnosticism. The doctrine that certainty about first principles or absolute truth is unattainable and that only perceptual phenomena are objects of exact knowledge. The belief that there can be no proof either that God exists or that God does not exist. [1] Agnosticism simply means that we can't prove whether God exists or not. Note that it does not say whether we may have a belief that God exists or not, merely that we can not prove this belief. So we can still form opinions on whether we think that it is likely that God exists.

The popular layman's definition of agnosticism simplifies and corrupts its real meaning. Agnosticism doesn't stop us thinking about God, it just places an extremely high ceiling over our thinking. Some also claim that agnosticism also states that we can have no knowledge whatsoever of God. Interaction? Agnostic was a word invented by British scientist Thomas H. Huxley in the 19th-century. Gnostic is a Greek word meaning knowledge , especially higher, esoteric knowledge of spiritual things. In the same manner as atheism, Huxley put the prefix a, meaning without , in essays on competition or bad, front of gnostic and formed a-gnostic , meaning without knowledge. He actually coined the word almost as a joke with fellow intellectuals, but it has survived, unfortunately. This new narrow claim that we can have no knowledge whatsoever of God and essay on human the supernatural is actually self-defeating. Saying that we can't have knowledge of the on grade inflation, supernatural because it works differently to the natural world means we already have some knowledge of the supernatural, that is, that it works differently. They also base their argument on essay interaction, the fact that God is a supernatural being, which is more knowledge about God, and essays or bad that he lives in the supernatural, yet more knowledge.

This clearly shows that we can have knowledge of God and the supernatural so the no knowledge definition fails. Essay On Human Interaction? The very nature of the supernatural may certainly limit our knowledge of it, but again it doesn't stop us thinking about in india, it. Therefore the following statement makes perfect sense: I am a theist (or atheist) and I believe that God exists (or doesn't exist) but I'm also an agnostic in that I accept that I can never prove my belief. Thus it would be perfectly reasonable to ask someone who claims, I'm an agnostic , as to whether they are an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist. For example I'm an atheist, specifically a 'strong' atheist in that I don't believe god exists, but I'm also agnostic because I accept that we can never prove my belief. In the same way the Pope is agnostic, he knows that he can never prove his unshakeable belief that God exists. Interaction? If both the Pope and on competition or bad I accept that we can't prove the existence or non-existence of God, why do we still have opposing views? For this we need to look at why agnosticism believes we can't provide proof for God and what this means in the real world. We appear to have two options. Prove God does exist or prove he doesn't. There have been many, many arguments put forward by on human interaction great thinkers throughout history regarding God, mainly attempting to twice shy seamus heaney essay, prove the essay interaction, existence of God.

Some have stood for essays my relations considerable time then other great thinkers have shown the arguments to be flawed for essay on human one reason or another, especially so with the advance of science. Regardless of charles essays of elia, what some religious fundamentalists claim, there are no arguments that prove that God exists. The words atheist and agnostic would be meaningless if there was. Likewise there are no arguments that prove that God doesn't exist. Let's start with some reasons why you can't prove God does exist. The main problem as we see it is what we're trying to prove the supernatural. By its very definition it exists beyond the natural universe, beyond natural laws. On Human? None of our instruments, none of lamb of elia my relations, our physical laws and interaction rules, none of our science, none of our logic, reasoning, critical thinking etc work in the supernatural. If they did then it would be no different than here, it would be natural not supernatural. Thus a procedure that would be accepted as proof in the natural world can't be used to prove something in the supernatural world because we could never be sure, never prove, that the procedure worked the charles essays of elia my relations, same way or meant the same thing when dealing with the essay, supernatural world.

We might be pretty confident that it did but we could never prove that it did. We can't prove the supernatural exists, God is personal, supernatural so we can't prove God exists. What about the old claim, Well, what if God turned up on your front lawn, you'd have to believe then. That would be the essay, ultimate proof. Personal Engineering Grad? Well, no it wouldn't. Essay? Someone turning up, performing the odd miracle and claiming to be God isn't proof because it could, for statement engineering grad school example, be a Hindu god just pretending to be God.

As long as the Hindu god had supernatural powers he would always be able to outsmart our attempts at checking his identity. This being wouldn't even have to be a supernatural being at all, he could just be an extremely advanced alien. Interaction? Pretending to be God would be an easy way for an alien to get our obedience. As Arthur C Clark said, Any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from pledge magic . There is plenty of evidence for this in our own history, where European explorers have been taken as gods by primitive natives due to essay on human, their appearance, knowledge and miraculous technology. So no matter who turns up claiming to be God, no matter how convincing they are, we could never prove that they really were God. So what evidence could we accept as proof of God? We don't think there is any.

We can't trust natural world evidence to allegiance, apply to the supernatural and while we could choose to trust the supernatural being themselves, this is on human, trust and not proof. Now to some reasons why you can't prove God doesn't exist either. There are two obstacles as we see it. Personal School? Again it involves the very nature of the supernatural and the fact that you can't prove a negative. (We agree that there are actually cases where you can prove a negative, but in interaction, the case that we're trying to argue here, we believe it is nigh on essays, impossible.) In the natural world it can (theoretically) be quite simple to prove something exists. This is proving a 'positive', proving something does exist.

For example, if you claimed that black sheep existed all you would have to do is produce a black sheep and essay your job is complete. Lamb Essays My Relations? However trying to prove a 'negative' is trying to prove something doesn't exist. It's impossible. Imagine you claim that black sheep don't actually exist. You look throughout your neighbourhood and find no black sheep. On Human? Are you entitled to now claim they don't exist?

No, because there are plenty of neighbourhoods that you haven't searched that might contain black sheep. Even if you searched the entire country we could still claim that there might still be black sheep in other countries. Searching every square metre of the entire planet is impossible so you could never claim that you had looked everywhere. Even if you did search everywhere, you don't know that very shy black sheep aren't just a few kilometres away from you and they keep moving to stay ahead of essay on grade, you. Due to your inability to find any black sheep you may be quite sure they don't exist, but you certainly haven't proved that they don't exist.

They may just be extremely rare. On Human Interaction? You may stumble across one tomorrow. Looking for black sheep is a cinch compared to looking for God. You could never say, I've looked everywhere in the universe for God and I didn't find him, therefore he doesn't exist . God is supposedly an twice shy seamus heaney all-powerful supernatural being. He could hide anywhere in the universe, behind a quark, in the past, in essay interaction, the future, in a parallel universe, all places that we have no hope of searching. Others tell us that God is pledge, actually outside space and time, another place that we can't look. No matter how sophisticated our technology becomes, no matter how many searches fail to find traces of God, no matter how much we believe that it would appear that God doesn't exist, we certainly haven't proved this. He could be invisible and standing right next to us. Thus you can't prove a negative. As we've already seen, the on human interaction, fact that God is allegiance essay pledge, a supernatural being is a problem in itself.

Black sheep and other natural world things that we may look for can't alter the essay on human interaction, laws of nature, they don't know what we're thinking, they don't know the future, they aren't everywhere at once, they aren't all-powerful. Statement School? Black sheep can't manipulate our experiment results without us being aware, God could. Even if we manage to design an experiment that appeared to prove that God doesn't exist, we can't be sure that God hasn't forced this conclusion onto us. Maybe God doesn't want to be found. Why? Who knows, after all they say God works in mysterious ways. Essay On Human Interaction? Our point is pledge, that even if you appear to prove God doesn't exist, you can never be completely sure that God just isn't manipulating your thinking. Essay On Human Interaction? Illogical as it sounds, if God actually existed he could make you think you've proved that he doesn't actually exist. After all, with God all things are possible, or so they say.

So, as extremely confident as you may be that God doesn't exist, you can never actually prove it. In the natural world you can prove things don't exist because you can show that if they were to exist they would break physical laws, and this is impossible. However God is part of the supernatural world and our laws don't apply there, therefore our proofs don't apply there either. So you can't prove that God does exist or that he doesn't exist. Where does that leave us? Should we all become agnostics? Many take this impossibility of proof as meaning we can't know one way or the other, believing that we should remain agnostic and admit our ignorance in regard to personal statement school, God's existence. Obviously we don't.

We definitely can't prove with 100% certainty the question of God's existence, but where does the essay on human, evidence point? Strange as it may seem, we also can't prove that the Sun will rise tomorrow, yet nearly everyone is extremely confident that it will. Essay Pledge? Our science and essay on human our experience give us great confidence that it will rise and we get on with our lives accordingly. Think of proof as being 100% certain and yet science says that we can only development of women be 99.9999% certain that the Sun will continue to rise. Do you go around saying you don't know whether the essay interaction, Sun will rise, that you're agnostic about the possibility of the Sun rising? Of course not. You look at the evidence available and it all points to the conclusion that it is very, very, very, very likely that the Sun will rise tomorrow. Of Women In India Essay? Thus you tell everyone that the Sun will rise tomorrow. You can't prove it, but this is where the evidence points. With the essay, question of God's existence we can look at scientific theories and evidence, philosophical and charles theological arguments, personal experiences, historical records etc and decide where the essay on human interaction, evidence points.

Does the evidence suggest that God exists or not? The Pope obviously believes that there is good evidence for God's existence, whereas we interpret the evidence as indicating that God doesn't exist. We are both so confident in personal statement engineering grad, the way we interpret the evidence that we are prepared to say we are sure we are right. In the same way that we are sure the Sun will rise tomorrow. Essay? However, as extremely confident each of us is or bad, with our respective views, neither of us is prepared to say that we can prove this claim. The suggestion by agnostics is that if we can't get absolute proof, 100% certainty, then we shouldn't accept 99.9999% either, or 90% or 75%.

This is ridiculous. This is a silly 'all or nothing' mentality. We either prove it conclusively or we say we have no idea. Apart from agnostics nobody in the real world works this way. You examine the essay on human, evidence for and against on grade a certain claim and make your stand accordingly. You look at interaction the evidence supporting leprechauns and you decide that they don't exist. You look at the evidence supporting DNA and you decide that it does exist. It's the same with God. You look at the evidence and take a stand. You don't claim, I accept that I will never be able to argumentative inflation, prove this debate 100% so I'm just not going to bother. Essay? As regards God, I have no opinion . So even though the Pope and allegiance I accept that we can't prove the existence or non-existence of God, we still find ourselves in essay interaction, opposition because we realise that absolute proof is statement engineering grad, only one part of the genuine inquiry into God's existence.

But in stark contrast to essay interaction, the agnostic, we are both prepared to express an opinion. Our mention of leprechauns actually highlights a major flaw in the agnostic's claim. It clearly demonstrates that their agnostic pretensions are a farce. Their basic claim is: I maintain that we can't prove whether God exists or not, therefore we must remain agnostic. Neither yes or no. This doesn't seem to present a problem until you remind the agnostic that God is a supernatural being. You then remind them that Zeus, Apollo, Thor, Maui, Osiris and Quetzalcoatl are also supernatural beings, gods in argumentative essay, fact. Essay? Of course the essays on competition, crucial difference is essay, that they don't believe these other gods exist, or ever existed. But why are they not agnostic about the existence of Zeus and Thor? Their argument for being an agnostic rests solely on their claim that you can't prove the existence or non-existence of on competition good or bad, a supernatural being. Zeus and Thor are supernatural beings.

Thus they should accept that when we attempt to investigate them we should run into the same problems as when we investigate the on human, Christian God. But they don't accept this. Agnostics are only ever agnostic about the Christian God (or Muslim or Jewish God etc, depending on their community). Or maybe an unknown deist god. Show us one agnostic that is essays, agnostic about Zeus and Thor, or that even mentions Zeus and Thor as part of the debate. Yet if they really believed in their argument they would mention them, since they would be agnostic about thousands of essay interaction, gods, thousands of supernatural beings. And not just gods either, but fairies, leprechauns, incubus and succubus, demons and inflation even the tooth fairy. But they're not. We'd challenge anyone to produce a sane, intelligent, informed adult that claims to be an agnostic that sincerely argues deep into the night that each and everyone of these supernatural beings might exist. We'd argue that in reality they would have likely dismissed most of them, or at least one of essay, them. And let's think about shy seamus heaney, what that means.

If an agnostic can find enough reason to dismiss a single supernatural being, even a minor one, one that perhaps only children now believe in, or one that only some long dead civilisation believed in, then that proves that the essay, concept is flawed, that it is development of women in india essay, possible to amass sufficient reason and evidence and take a firm stance on whether supernatural beings gods exist. If ten years ago an agnostic decided that the essay on human, tooth fairy wasn't real, and last week she decided that the essay pledge, god Zeus wasn't real either, taking the entire ancient Greek pantheon with him into oblivion, she has demonstrated that it's possible in practice to rationally declare a specific god, a specific supernatural being, to be someone that exists only in essay on human, our imagination. And if she can dismiss the tooth fairy, then why not leprechauns and Santa Claus? And if her dismissal of the charles lamb essays, ancient Greek gods was because of interaction, what she'd learnt about science and on grade history, might she not also come to believe that there's likely enough evidence to on human interaction, justify dismissing the gods of twice shy seamus heaney essay, numerous other ancient cultures too, such as the Egyptians, Romans, Babylonians, Aztec etc? Starting off by considering whether minor supernatural beings existed, such as the tooth fairy, and then continuing to use reason and evidence to examine the plausibility of essay interaction, supernatural beings claiming more powers, such as the Norse god Thor with his powerful hammer, might not our agnostic, small step by small step, slowly start to believe that most of the allegiance essay, gods featured in the history of mankind are mythical, that there is no good reason to essay interaction, believe that they were ever real? But it doesn't matter if our agnostic stopped with the tooth fairy. All it takes is essay pledge, one, and the argument for agnosticism is defeated. As soon as you feel justified in dismissing a single supernatural being, even a minor one such as the tooth fairy, while still not having absolute, categorical proof, then you can longer argue that, because of their very nature, the evidence needed to decide about supernatural beings gods will forever be denied us. You've demonstrated that with reason and given sufficient evidence it's possible to consider a god and then justifiably declare that god fictional. And if it's possible with one god, why not two gods, why not all gods?

Beyond a childish desire to essay on human interaction, keep the gods of allegiance pledge, your parents near, what would make some gods immune from rational inquiry but not others? Once you've dismissed someone else's god, even a child's, it's illogical to then say that it's impossible for essay them to grad, attempt the same with your gods. What makes your favourite gods impervious to consideration? According to Dr Michael Shermer, anthropologists estimate that over the past ten thousand years humans have created roughly ten thousand different religions. [2] And these have splintered into 100,000 different sects. Since nearly all of these religions had multiple gods, even assuming an average of 10 gods each means over 100,000 different gods. Some accounts claim that Hinduism alone contains over a million gods. Interaction? That's a hell of a lot of gods. And yet agnostics have, we believe, rejected nearly every single one. They've rejected gods called Zeus, gods called Thor and gods called Osiris. Charles Lamb Of Elia? But they stumble when they encounter another god called Jehovah, Yahweh, or to essay on human, his friends, simply God. Essays? What's happened?

Why do they apply two standards? Why have they turned into hypocrites? Their unwillingness to reject the Christian God, while happily rejecting all the essay on human interaction, others, consciously or subconsciously, demonstrates that a great many agnostics are nothing other than closet Christians. Their agnosticism regarding Christianity is nothing but an excuse. They use the word as a shield. This agnostic is someone who when asked about the existence of God is unwilling to essays on competition good or bad, commit. They sit on the fence, they don't want to essay on human interaction, take sides, they don't want to offend.

Why? Well, some are just too lazy to think about it. Others are too stupid to think about of women essay, it. Others are playing safe. They don't want to anger God just in case he does exist. Still others seem to essay on human, have a real fear of the twice essay, 'atheist' tag, being too scared to essay on human interaction, reveal their honest opinion since it may affect relationships, employment, political aspirations etc.

This is the true definition of popular agnosticism. It's a cop out. They're certainly taking a position, but it's a position of apathy, ignorance or deception disguised as intellectual honesty. Ian Harris takes a similar view: 'Agnosticism can end up providing a complacent perch for on competition good anyone who has neither the inclination nor the imagination to on human, wrestle with the central religious questions of an age.' Likewise Laurence Twaddle in essays on competition good, his book 'Making Sense of English in Religion' , had this to say: 'Agnosticism is essay, often expressed as an essays of elia my relations indication of an open mind but it could equally be interpreted as the last refuge of on human, a lazy mind, unwilling to pursue the essay, arguments to one end or the other.' In 'Atheism: What Everyone Needs to interaction, Know' , Michael Ruse wrote: 'Without being condescending . could it be that going all the way to atheism requires a certain book learning to realize exactly what is entailed, whereas being an agnostic can be basically a matter of indifference?' And Jesse Bering in 'The God Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life' , argued that: 'We are the first generation, in argumentative essay inflation, the history of our species, to essay on human, be confronted directly by pledge the full scientific weight of an essay on human argument that renders a personal God both unnecessary and charles highly unlikely. The many loopholes of a more humble agnosticism have suddenly become unreasonable places to interaction, continue burying our heads.' Arguing for charles of elia my relations atheism and against essay agnosticism, Stefan Molyneux in his book 'Against the Gods?' wrote: 'It is not rational to even entertain the possibility of the existence of essay on grade inflation, irrational entities. We do not accept agnosticism about unicorns, fairies, square circles, pixies or the proposition that two and two make five why do we create a special exception in the realm of deities? Surely it is because the social cost of rejecting Gods is far higher than the social cost of rejecting goblins.' And this from PZ Myers: 'Our culture is essay on human interaction, currently divided between three groups: Atheists, who think the development in india essay, truth matters, and want our problems addressed with real-world solutions; theists, who want a god or supernatural powers to solve our problems with magic; and fence-sitting parasites . who see a personal opportunity to pander to the believers for on human their own gain, who will ride the conflict while pretending to twice heaney essay, be aloof from essay it, and win popularity with the masses by trying to tell everyone they're all right.' Agnosticism is supposedly a position you reach because you have thought about religion, science, philosophy etc but more often than not it shows just the personal grad school, opposite. Agnostics are often ignorant of the on human, very reasons you can't prove or disprove God. Likewise they are usually ignorant of the theistic arguments that try to show God does exist and the atheistic arguments that attempt to demonstrate he doesn't. We have tried to show that on the belief spectrum there are only on competition good theists and essay on human interaction atheists, believers and non-believers. Development Of Women Essay? Thus the essay on human interaction, concept of argumentative essay on grade inflation, agnosticism, a mythical land between the two is just that, mythical.

We've shown that the essay on human interaction, real meaning of agnosticism only talks about the twice heaney, absolute proof of God's existence, and that it does not prevent us from looking at all the available evidence, and in essay on human interaction, doing so, forming opinions about God. Essay? This inquiry, deep or superficial, turns us all into believers or non-believers. There is no other option, no middle path. We've also shown that the popular concept of agnosticism is seriously flawed since agnostics are only agnostic about one god, maybe two, out of possible millions. Also that the majority of agnostics use the essay, term as a shield, as an excuse not to reveal their real views.

They use it to deceive. It's time to statement school, grow a backbone and form an opinion. This is on human interaction, what intellectual honesty really means. Face your fear. You may well be an allegiance pledge atheist. Learn to live with it. Authors: John L. Ateo, Rachel C. Interaction? Copyright © 2007, by lamb essays of elia my relations the 'SILLY BELIEFS' website. All rights reserved.

About.com: Agnosticism / Atheism. About.com: Agnosticism / Atheism. About.com: Agnosticism / Atheism. [1] The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition.

Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Essay on Basic Concepts of Human Interaction - 498 Words | Bartleby

Essay On Electricity In Service Of Man. Essay On Electricity In Service Of Man. Essay On Electricity In Service Of Man. The cost-effective price means no quality compromise! We all have walked miles in essay student’s shoes and we do realize your needs. Our service is interested in providing help in charles lamb of elia my relations essay writing for different students, and on human interaction, each client is of elia my relations, equally important to us. The service we have created presents an easy-to-use platform to buy essay online and to receive the exact essay you need. Our site presents a vast choice of the interaction, options.

With us you are provided with a chance to take active part in essays on competition writing your essay. The objective of interaction, our service is engineering, satisfying the needs of the clients, which means that your preferences, comments, and instruction will be carefully followed. You’re always running out of time especially when you are at essay on human college. Colleges and universities can load you with the tons of twice, essays, and essay on human interaction, sometimes it is hard to understand where to charles essays of elia my relations start from. Students often face situations when they have a solid theoretical background, but encounter problems with the text structuring. Or sometimes, the approaching finals are always a stressing period which can influence the process and quality of your essay. In order to conduct a successful study, the concentration and efforts have to be maximized. Our team consists of people who are into on human dealing with extreme situations and challenges head on. Working on the verge of the opportunities is our pleasure.

The writers are not afraid of: Time constraints Levels of complexity Essay types The volume of research. Why should I buy college essays from your site? College time is priceless. However, some teachers seem to be merciless: the amount and scrupulosity of the instructions provided for essay writing is overwhelming. Lamb My Relations? Every teacher has his own understanding of the final assignment and knows what he/she wishes to get. That is why the degree of instructions fulfillment directly affects the mark and, consequently, may influence your academic future. You don’t have to interaction worry about twice shy seamus, it with our site when buying essays online! Our writing team’s strengths are extreme attentiveness and mindfulness. No detail will be missed. We share the same objectives with our clients – to prepare the best essay possible.

For this purpose, it is very important for our clients to provide the essay, complete and utter information concerning your essay. We hope for our win-win collaboration each time you buy essays online cheap! Buying essay from our site usually looks as follows: Each instruction field must be thoroughly filled, so our writers get the full picture of the development of women essay, essay you need Attach the essay, files if necessary You may contact us 24 / 7 and inform about any clarifications or additional details The choice of the author is in essay your hands. Essay Interaction? You can continue working with the chosen writer, your preferences will be saved and taken into account You are free to ask for a draft of development in india, your essay and stay involved in writing process and monitor the progress Despite the essay on human interaction, professionalism of our writers, each essay is argumentative essay on grade inflation, carefully checked by the Quality Assurance Department to make sure you get the best paper Anti-plagiarism is the core principle: we make sure the essay is 100 percent unique the essay on human interaction, plagiarism possibility is excluded You receive your essay Receive an A-stamped paper! Why we offer to buy our essays online cheap? Our writers look at each essay through the prism of knowledge, solid research background, argumentation, and critical approach. Personal Statement Engineering Grad School? The philosophy of our company outlines the highest quality, student satisfaction and exceeded expectations and put these attributes before the essay, financial benefit. We are the best choice in of women essay essay emergency! Our writers can be challenged with the urgency up to several hours, and you won’t be disappointed. We approach writing your essays in a special way, because we are used to think different.

The authors are not only savants in their field; they are also professional writers, who can provide perfectly structured text. Essay On Human Interaction? Your essay will be different from the other soulless works. It will showcase the real thinking process and will have the heaney essay, sparkle that will be definitely evaluated by your teacher. Our writers are professionals, and essay on human interaction, each essay is treated equally seriously. The efforts used for the college essay, high school essay, or dissertation are the same. If you lack time or cannot write your essay for any other reason – our service is to stand by!

All the papers you get at englishessays.net are meant for essay, research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit. should be there! Terms conditions Privacy policy Referral program. Please read these Terms and Conditions (“Terms” and/or “Terms and essay interaction, Conditions”) carefully before using the englishessays.net website (“Website”). Your access to and use of twice essay, Website are conditioned on essay on human interaction your full acceptance and compliance with these Terms and statement engineering grad school, Conditions and this Website Privacy Policy, which are published at englishessays.net and which are incorporated herein by reference (“Privacy Policy”).

These Terms and essay interaction, Conditions and Privacy Policy are applied to all visitors, users and development of women essay, others who access or use this Website. By accessing or using this Website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. If you disagree with these Terms and Conditions and/or Privacy Policy or any part of them, you must not use this Website. Capitalized terms defined in these Terms and Conditions shall have no other meaning but set forward in this section. The following terminology is on human interaction, applied to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy and Refund and allegiance essay, Revision Policy: “Client”, “You” and “Your” refers to you, the on human, person accessing this Website and statement engineering grad, accepting these Terms and Conditions. “We”, “Us” and “Ourselves” refers to englishessays.net website.

Any use of the interaction, above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same. By using our Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit to englishessays.net is truthful and accurate; (b) you will maintain the accuracy of on competition, such information; (c) you are 18 years of essay on human, age or older and/or have full legal capacity to enter into legally binding relations; and of elia my relations, (d) your use of the essay on human interaction, Services does not violate any applicable law, regulation, and/or your college/university/school rules. Your profile may be deleted and Services provided to you may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are less than 18 years of shy seamus heaney, age and/or do not have full legal capacity to enter into legally binding relations. Subjected to full compliance with these Terms and on human, Conditions, englishessays.net shall provide academic writing services as described more fully on the Website (“Services”). Services may include, but not be limited to, providing our Clients with dissertations, research papers, book reports, term papers, and shy seamus heaney essay, other types of on human, assignments written by on competition englishessays.net team (“Paper”) which are intended for research/reference purposes and for your personal use only. Services may include editing, proofreading, paraphrasing, or formatting existing papers of our Clients.

Please note that rewriting an interaction, existing paper that contains 40% or more plagiarized content may qualify as providing you with a custom Paper and essay, shall be charged for on human interaction, accordingly. Please note that Services may be provided only to the users who submit an appropriate order form at the Website and englishessays.net may charge fees for such Services. The Services are provided according to the provisions of these Terms and Conditions and the specific commercial provisions and policies (including Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, etc.) as detailed on the Website, and these provisions and policies may be amended or changed from essay pledge time to on human time. The format of the Papers we provide: 12 point Times New Roman; Bibliography on a separate page; Approximately 250 words per page; One inch margin top, bottom, left, right; Title and Reference pages are free of charge.

In case Client needs a single-spaced Paper they are to pay a double fee. The standard Paper formatting includes a Title page , main content of the Paper, and a Reference page. Note that you pay only for twice shy seamus heaney, the main content of the Paper, while a Title page and a Reference page are provided free of charge. englishessays.net reserves the right to use any relevant materials available, such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, online publications, etc., unless the Client indicates some specific sources to be used. PLACING AN ORDER. When placing your order, you must provide accurate and complete information. You are solely responsible for any possible consequences and misunderstandings, in case you provide us with inaccurate and/or incorrect and/or unfaithful information. Please be advised that you will be asked to give final confirmation to the instructions you provide in order details. Your Paper instructions should be confirmed in your Order Tracking Area within 3 hours after placing your order (and within 1 hour for essay on human, orders with urgency less than 24 hours).

Orders without instructions will not be worked on and may be delayed and you accept sole responsibility for such delay. englishessays.net guarantees that the delivered Paper will meet only development essay, confirmed requirements. You must not change the instructions once you have confirmed them. Any alterations to confirmed instructions are considered as additional order, thereby requiring additional payment. All payments are due upon receipt. Essay On Human Interaction? If the payment is not received or payment method is declined, the Client forfeits of Services. All fees are exclusive of all taxes and/or levies, and/or duties imposed by taxing authorities, and you shall be responsible for payment of all such taxes and/or levies, and/or duties. You agree to pay any such taxes that might be applicable to your use of the Services and payments made by you under these Terms. If at any time you contact your bank or credit card company and decline or otherwise reject the charge of any payment, this act will be considered as a breach of your obligation hereunder and your use of the Services will be automatically terminated.

Use of stolen credit card and/or any credit card fraud is considered to be a serious crime. englishessays.net closely cooperates with our payment provider to prevent and fight online fraud. In case of any online fraud, appropriate state authorities will be contacted immediately. By doing a chargeback, you agree to give up all your rights to the Paper automatically. At the same time, you authorize englishessays.net to publish the argumentative essay inflation, completed Paper and start the authorship procedure that will allow us to determine if you have used any parts of the Paper. The procedure may include contacting your school officials and/or posting your full details along with the completed Paper online. englishessays.net reserves the right to change its prices at any time in its sole discretion and such changes or modifications shall be posted online at the Website and become effective immediately without need for further notice to on human any Client and/or user. We care about our Clients and are always looking for essay, ways to offer them the best value for money.

One method we use is a discount system. englishessays.net, at its sole discretion, shall have the right to provide our Clients with discount programs as described more fully and published on the Website. According to essay our loyalty program, you earn back 10% of your total bill in Points (1 currency unit (inter alia USD/ EUR/ GBP etc.) = 1 Point) after you make your first order. Your Points are accumulated on your Credit Balance. “Credit Balance” is an on competition good or bad, account for Points of essay, a Client which can be used for future purchases on the Website exclusively. Development Of Women Essay? You can use your Points for your next purchases on essay on human interaction the Website exclusively. Inflation? Your Points cannot be refunded. The discount may be obtained by on human interaction the use of the promo code. Charles Lamb Essays? The amount of essay on human interaction, Points added to the Credit Balance is argumentative on grade, calculated on the basis of the essay, order price excluding the applied discount (if any). Later, 5% of every next order (not including credits) is added to your Credit Balance. englishessays.net will issue a refund to you only according to these Terms. englishessays.net offers a 14-day money back period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages (”Refund Period”). Development In India? Refund Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and on human interaction, expires on the last day of the Refund Period. In case you are not satisfied with any of the lamb essays my relations, Services, you can submit a refund request according to these Terms within the interaction, Refund Period.

Once the Refund Period elapses, englishessays.net will not refund any amounts paid. If the order is not completed and/or the Paper is not downloaded or delivered in its complete form by or to allegiance pledge you, the full refund is on human interaction, issued at any time. In the event of order cancellation, the on grade, funds will be debited back only to the account of the initial payment within 5-7 business days from the essay, time of cancellation request. In other case englishessays.net assesses refund requests on a case-by-case basis as there are usually unique reasons as to why a refund request is made. Please note that if you request a refund, we may require documented proof that the quality of your order is argumentative essay inflation, low (e.g., scan copy of essay interaction, your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.). On Grade Inflation? Should you feel it necessary to essay interaction make a refund request, we will immediately forward your order to our Quality Assurance Department. After comparing their findings with the reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period.

In case englishessays.net reimburses the money because of mistakes or some irrelevance to the initial instructions, our Quality Assurance Department, at allegiance pledge its sole discretion, evaluates the on human interaction, quality of the Paper and twice shy seamus essay, refunds an amount comparable to the percentage of incorrect content in the Paper and mistakes present in it. englishessays.net provides various methods of contact (i.e. email, telephone, message board, and on human interaction, live chat) to heaney facilitate communication between you, us and the writer assigned to complete an on human interaction, order. Using any of these methods, our Customer Support Center is available to you at any time and will respond to any refund request or other issue promptly. However, if such a request is not received using any of the lamb of elia my relations, aforementioned methods within the essay on human interaction, Refund Period, englishessays.net will not be obliged to honor or consider the above said request. Should the Paper delivery be delayed due to unexpected circumstances, from the side of englishessays.net, we may provide compensation for the breach of the twice essay, order deadline in on human the form of a credit or a discount to be used towards your next order with us.

Please be informed that delivery time deviation is not a subject to argumentative on grade inflation refund. Any revision request or complaint in regards to a Paper that englishessays.net has provided must be made within the revision period (“Revision Period”). englishessays.net offers a 14-day Revision Period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages. Revision Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the Revision Period. After that point, no revision and/or complaint will be accepted. englishessays.net recognizes that orders vary in size and complexity; as a result, dissertation, thesis and/or other sufficiently large assignment may be granted 30-day Revision Period. Sufficiency in the size of the Paper will be determined by essay englishessays.net in its sole discretion. In case a request for revision is personal, not submitted within the Revision Period, englishessays.net tacitly accepts that the Client is satisfied with the Paper and requires no further actions to be taken in regards to the Paper unless extra payment is essay interaction, provided or a new order is placed. Upon receiving your completed assignment you are entitled to a free revision should the Paper fail to on competition or bad meet your instructions or defined the requirements in any way.

When this is the case, you are entitled to request as many revisions as may be required to make the Paper consistent and compliant with your instructions. During the essay on human, Revision Period the request for revision may be made at development any time. All revisions must be based on the original order instructions. If at the time of the revision request you provide new, additional, or differing instructions, this will be interpreted as an application for new Paper and thus, will require an additional payment. Furthermore, should you request a revision after the Revision Period, it will also be considered as a new order requiring an additional payment. We may require you to interaction supply us with personal identifying information, and we may also legally consult other sources to obtain information about you. By accepting these Terms and charles of elia, Conditions, you authorize us to make any inquiries we consider necessary to validate the information that you provide us with. We may do this directly or by verifying your information against essay on human interaction, third party databases; or through other sources. Essentially, verification procedure involves, inter alia, confirming that the charles lamb my relations, order is authentic and essay, that the essay on grade, cardholder is aware of charges by placing a phone call to them, and in interaction certain cases by lamb of elia requesting some additional documents to be submitted for verification to our Risk Department.

In order to ensure timely delivery of essay, your order, this procedure must be completed quickly and without delay. Therefore, it is vital to allegiance provide accurate and valid phone numbers. Failure to verify an order may result in order cancellation or the on human interaction, order being placed on essays hold. You consent to our processing your personal information for essay on human interaction, the purposes of providing the Services, including for verification purposes as set out herein. You also consent to heaney essay the use of such data for communicating with you, for statutory and accounting purposes. You acknowledge that you have read and consented to englishessays.net's Privacy Policy.

LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. englishessays.net will not be liable to you in relation to the contents of, the use of, or otherwise in essay connection with, this Website: for failure to of elia learn the on human, material covered by the Paper; and. for your final grade; and. for the outcome or consequences of charles lamb essays my relations, submission the essay on human interaction, Paper to any academic institution; and. excludes all liability for twice shy seamus heaney, damages arising out of or in connection with your use of this Website.

The latter includes, without limitation, damage caused to essay on human your computer, computer software, systems and programs and essay on grade inflation, the data thereon, or any other direct or indirect, consequential and incidental damages. The Paper provided to you by interaction englishessays.net remains our property and is the subject to copyright and shy seamus essay, other intellectual property rights under local and international laws conventions. The Paper is intended for your personal use only and it may not be used, copied, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for any other purposes without our prior written consent. You agree not to essay interaction engage in the use, copying, or distribution of Papers other than expressly permitted herein. We post Clients` testimonials on our Website which may contain personal information (first name or initials).

Hereby by accessing or using this Website, you provide us with your consent to post your first name/initials along with your testimonial on our Website. Inflation? We ensure our posting these testimonials does not interfere with your confidentiality. Essay? If you wish to request the removal of your testimonial, you may contact us at development of women in india [emailprotected] NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES. englishessays.net reserves the right to change these Terms and Conditions at any time and your continued use of the Website will signify your acceptance of any adjustment, improvements and/or alterations to these Terms and Conditions. You are, therefore, advised to re-read these Terms and Conditions on a regular basis.

This web site is owned and on human interaction, operated by Viatta Business Ltd. HEXO+ Self-Flying Camera Drone, with a suggested retail price of essay inflation, $1,249.00 USD («Main prize»). FreePage (single use) SMS inform (single use) Plagiarism Report (single use) 50$ to your bonus balance which you can use in on human 365 days 100$ to your bonus balance which you can use in 365 days. 2. Promotional Period. The promotion begins on 7.18.2017, at 9:00 am and ends on 7.28.2017 at 10:00 pm. This Privacy Policy (“Policy”) describes how information about You is collected, used and disclosed and provides other important privacy information, describes when and how we may change this Policy, and tells You how to contact us with any questions or comments. We collect information about You and computer(s) You use when You use our Services or otherwise interact with us. “Personal Information” means information that we directly associate with a specific person or entity (for example: name; addresses; telephone numbers; email address; payment information; device location etc.). “Client”, “User”, “You” and “Your” refers to you, the person accessing this Website and accepting these Privacy Policy. Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same. HOW INFORMATION ABOUT YOU IS COLLECTED.

We collect information about You in three primary ways: Information You Provide. We collect information that You provide to us when You apply for and use and/or purchase our Services or otherwise communicate with us. For example, some of the ways You may provide information to us include: When You purchase our Services, the payment system will require your personal, contact, billing and credit information. When You establish or modify Your user account online, We may collect user identification information, passwords, and/or security question responses that You will use for future sign-on. When You interact with our Customer Service representatives, enter information on our Website, submit survey responses, or pay for personal school, Services, we may also collect Personal Information and other information. We may monitor and record phone calls, e-mails, live chats, or other communications between You and essay on human interaction, our Customer Service representatives or other employees or representatives. Information We Collect Automatically. We automatically collect a variety of inflation, information associated with Your use of our Services.

Each time You visit the Website, Personal Information is automatically gathered. In general, this information does not identify You personally. Examples of automatically collected personal information include, but are not limited to: IP address, Collection Date, Publisher Name, Connection Speed, Day of Week Time of Day (hour), Language settings, Country, City (relating to IP address, if available). For example, some of the ways we may automatically collect information include: Cookies and similar technologies. A “cookie” is a small text file that a web site can place on Your computer's hard drive in order, for example, to collect information about Your activities on the Website. The cookie transmits this information back to the Website's computer, which, generally speaking, is the only computer that can read it. We need to use cookies on essay the Website to development in india essay enhance the essay on human, user experience and personal grad school, avoid multiple logins or password authentication requests. We may use, or we may engage third-parties to use on our behalf, cookies or similar web tags (small data text files placed on your computer or device) or similar technologies to identify Your computer or device and record Your preferences and interaction, other data so that our Website can personalize Your visit(s), see which areas and features of essay, our Website are popular, and improve our Website and Your experience.

Depending upon Your computer, You may be able to on human set Your browser(s) to twice shy seamus heaney reject cookies or delete cookies, but that may result in essay interaction the loss of some functionality on the Website. We may also use web beacons (small graphic images on a web page or an pledge, HTML e-mail) to monitor interaction with our websites or e-mails. Web beacons are generally invisible because they are very small (only 1-by-1 pixel) and essay interaction, the same color as the argumentative essay on grade, background of the web page or e-mail message. Web Browsing Activity. When accessing our Website, We automatically collect certain information about Your computer and essay on human interaction, Your visit, such as your IP address, browser type, date and time, the web page You visited before visiting our Website, Your activities and essay, purchases on our Website, and other analytical information associated with the Website. Information From Other Sources. We may also obtain information about essay interaction, You from statement grad school other sources. For example, We may receive credit information from third-party sources before initiating Your service. We may also purchase or obtain Personal Information (for example, e-mail lists, postal mail lists, demographic and marketing data) from interaction others.

HOW WE USE INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU. We use the essays or bad, information We collect for a variety of business purposes, such as: To provide and bill for Services You purchase; To deliver and confirm Services You obtain from us; To verify Your identity and maintain a record of on human, Your transactions and interactions with us; To provide customer services to You; To create, modify, improve, enhance, remove or fix our Services and their performance; To identify and suggest products or services that might interest You;

To make internal business decisions about current and pledge, future Service offerings; To provide You customized user experiences, including personalized Services offerings; To protect our rights, interests, safety and property and that of our customers, service providers and essay, other third parties; and. To comply with law or as required for legal purposes. We may use Personal Information for investigations or prevention of fraud or network abuse. We may use information we collect to contact You about our and/or third-party products, services, and offers that We believe You may find of interest. We may contact You by essay pledge telephone, postal mail, e-mail, or other methods. You may see advertisements when You visit our Website. We may help advertisers better reach our customers by providing certain customer information, including geographic information, language preferences or demographic information obtained from other companies.

This information is used by advertisers to determine which ads may be more relevant to You. On Human? However, we do not share Personal Information outside of on competition or bad, our corporate family for advertising purposes without Your consent. WHEN WE SHARE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. We do not sell, license, rent, or otherwise provide Your Personal Information to unaffiliated third-parties (parties outside our corporate family) without Your consent. We may, however, disclose Your information to unaffiliated third-parties as follows: With Your Consent. We may disclose Personal Information about essay, You to third-parties with Your consent. We may obtain Your consent in writing; online, through “click-through” agreements; when You accept the terms of disclosures for charles essays of elia, certain Services; orally, when You interact with our customer service representatives. We encourage You not to share Your password. If You provide Your user account password and/or security question responses to third parties they will have access to Your Personal Information when they access Your user account with Your account password.

To Our Service Providers. We may disclose information to third-party vendors and partners who complete transactions or perform services on our behalf (for example, credit/debit card processing, billing, customer service, auditing, and marketing). In a Business Transfer. We may sell, disclose, or transfer information about You as part of a corporate business transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, joint venture, corporate reorganization, financing, or sale of company assets, or in essay on human interaction the unlikely event of of women in india essay, insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership, in which such information could be transferred to essay third-parties as a business asset in essays on competition the transaction. For Legal Process Protection. We may disclose Personal Information, and essay on human, other information about You, or Your communications, where we have a good faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of of women essay, such information is reasonably necessary: to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request; to enforce or apply agreements, or initiate, render, bill, and collect for interaction, services and products (including to collection agencies in order to obtain payment for our products and services); to protect our rights or interests, or property or safety or that of development, others; in connection with claims, disputes, or litigation – in court or elsewhere; to facilitate or verify the essay on human interaction, appropriate calculation of twice heaney, taxes, fees, or other obligations; or.

in an emergency situation. We may provide information that does not identify You personally to third-parties for marketing, advertising or other purposes. HOW WE STORE AND PROTECT THE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. Protecting Your Information. We use a variety of physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to essay interaction protect Personal Information from personal unauthorized access, use, or disclosure while it is essay on human, under our control. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the internet can be guaranteed to allegiance pledge be completely secure. As a result, although we will utilize such measures, we do not guarantee You against essay interaction, the loss, misuse, or alteration of Personal Information under our control, and You provide Personal Information to us at Your own risk. You should always take care with how You handle and heaney essay, disclose your Personal Information and should avoid sending Personal Information through insecure e-mail, social networks or other internet channels. Retention and essay interaction, Disposal.

We retain information only for as long as we have a business or tax need or as applicable laws, regulations and/or government orders allow. Argumentative On Grade? When we dispose of Personal Information, we use reasonable procedures designed to erase or render it unreadable (for example, shredding documents and wiping electronic media). PRIVACY POLICY UPDATES. How We Communicate Changes to This Policy. We may update this Policy at any time to provide updates to or clarification of essay on human interaction, our practices. If we make changes we may provide You with additional notice (such as adding a statement to the homepage of our Website or sending You a notification).

You should refer to statement engineering grad this Policy often for the latest information and the effective date of any changes. This web site is owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd . A Partner is an individual who refers customers. A Referral is an individual who requests a service via the referral link given by a Partner. With the interaction, first order, a Referral acquires a 15% discount on the order, while a Partner receives $50 to the Referral Balance. With further purchases, a Partner earns 5% of the Referral’s total order price. All money earned with the Referral Program is essay, stored on your Referral Balance. A Partner can transfer the on human, money to the Bonus Balance and use it to purchase a service.

It is possible to lamb essays my relations transfer the sum to the Partner’s PayPal account (no less than $20).

Buy Essay Online -
Human Interaction Essay Examples | Kibin

Jobs at on human, The Los Angeles Film School. Thank you for your interest in starting a career with The Los Angeles Film School! The following list of jobs represents all currently open positions. Please browse through the available opportunities, and if you feel you’re qualified for one of the listed jobs, please submit a resume for review. OIF/OEF Veterans Are Encouraged to Apply! If you are an OIF/OEF Veteran, please email your resume and cover letter to: vetjobs@lafilm.com. The Los Angeles Film School is seeking an instructor to teach in its animation bachelor’s degree program. The Los Angeles Film School is an accredited, degree-granting college that offers career-focused programs in entertainment and media arts education. Our campus has over 250,000 square feet of classrooms, labs and production spaces and is located in the heart of Hollywood, California. Essential Duties and Responsibilities:

Create an environment of learning through effective teaching skills, maintain student-centered focus, and update curriculum to keep current and relevant to shy seamus heaney, industry standards. Utilize a variety of teaching strategies and encourage active learning. Create learning activities, including assignments, tests, quizzes and labs, and assess student outcomes in a timely manner through effective assessment and feedback practices. Interact positively with diverse student populations; provide all students with equal opportunities for learning. Demonstrate a commitment to on human, the industry, maintain knowledge and skill relevancy through continuing education as defined in essay pledge the faculty development plan. Strong organizational, analytical, and interpersonal skills Exceptional written and verbal communication skills, including proofreading and editing for grammar and punctuation Detail oriented Ability to explain complex concepts in on human interaction simple terms Ability to multi-task while working independently or collaboratively with other teachers and staff Ability to interact with students and staff at all levels in a fast-paced environment. Education and/or Experience: The ideal candidate must have a minimum of four (4) years related and verifiable work experience and required to hold at least a bachelor’s degree in animation or related field from an accredited college or university. Proficiency using Adobe Photoshop and personal engineering Maya or 3D software equivalent Knowledge of anatomy/life/perspective drawing and illustration skills. Please submit resume with link(s) to essay, website(s) of your professional work to HR_AcademicAffairs@lafilm.edu.

Recording Instructor – Postproduction. The Los Angeles Recording School, a division of The Los Angeles Film School, a leader in entertainment arts education, is seeking instructors for shy seamus heaney our Associate of essay interaction, Science in Recording Arts Degree. The Recording Arts program is a study of modern recording technology and techniques in music, postproduction, and the workings of the twice heaney essay entertainment business. We are looking for on human interaction creative, passionate individuals with a background in training or teaching to work with our student body of young creatives from diverse cultural and on grade inflation educational backgrounds. The School provides a benefit package to full-time instructors. Please read the essay on human interaction Experience Required section below. Our accreditation requires verification of the education and work experience requirements. We cannot consider applicants who do not meet these requirements. Ideal applicants are capable of teaching in multiple areas of twice shy seamus heaney, specialty.

Currently we have positions available in the following areas of instruction: The ideal candidate should possess experience and a solid understanding of: The postproduction process and practice including the recording and editing of on human, Dialog, EFX, Foley and ADR, spotting, cuing, and rerecording mixing. Postproduction recording techniques and session procedures. Industry standard practices in shy seamus heaney audio for essay on human interaction Film, Television, Games, and VR. The theory and operation of lamb, analog recording gear including console signal flow. Sound design and its theoretical foundations Pro Tools and essay common plug-ins used in allegiance essay the Postproduction industry. Additional skills in Music recording and production are also desirable. Serve as the essay instructor for assigned course(s) or course sections and are responsible for teaching, advising students, administrative duties related to their courses, participation in open houses, campus events, and other campus activities. Contribute to argumentative essay on grade, the development and maintenance of course materials consistent with industry standards and stated learning objectives for the course and program as directed by the Program Director.

Provide academic support to students via personal meetings, phone, and e-mail. Assist in developing and implementing retention initiatives. Grade subjective examinations and other work. On Human Interaction? Monitor and lead online discussion boards and chat activity. Ensure student’s successful completion of course objectives and learning outcomes. Inflation? Maintain accurate academic records including grades, attendance and student communications, in full compliance with federal and state privacy laws Perform these responsibilities with the highest professional standards consistent with the on human interaction vision, mission and strategy of the Los Angeles Film School. Complete and argumentative essay document a minimum of 16 hours continuing education per year. Instructors are evaluated on some or all of essay interaction, these criteria: Assessments of essays good or bad, student learning outcomes. Student evaluations.

Student retention. In-class observations. Compliance with all academic, operational and essay interaction financial policies of the charles essays my relations school. Peer reviews. General performance and conduct as per standard Los Angeles Film School employee evaluations. Essay? Adherence to supervisory and managerial guidelines. A minimum of four years related professional work experience in the subject area being taught.

Bachelor’s Degree in a related field preferred; Associate’s Degree required. Argumentative On Grade? Teaching and/or public speaking experience. Comfortable with both Apple and Windows operating systems. Essay Interaction? Competent using Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and Pro Tools, experience with Keynote software is shy seamus essay a plus. Other Skills Required and General Information: Positive attitude, a desire to help others, and a passion for educating. Interaction? Excellent communication abilities, both verbal and of women in india written. Essay On Human? Proficient with relevant industry tools. The school operates 16 hours per day, 7 days per week. Classes and essay on grade inflation administrative hours are primarily weekdays, but weekend or evening duties may be required at essay on human, times. Associate degree in a related field.

Bachelor degree or higher preferred. Please email resume and letter of interest to statement engineering grad, HR@lafilm.edu addressing applicant qualifications for this position. No phone calls please. All positions are subject to full background check. The Los Angeles Film School, a leader in entertainment arts education, is seeking professionals with experience in animation and/or game art to teach in its animation program. The Los Angeles Film School is an accredited, degree-granting college that offers career-focused programs in entertainment and on human media arts education. Our campus has over 250,000 square feet of classrooms, labs and production spaces and is located in the heart of Hollywood, just steps from the intersection of Sunset and Vine.

Duties and or bad Responsibilities: Teach assigned courses (15-20 hours of in class instruction per week). Maintain accurate academic records including grades, attendance and student feedback. Participate in development and assessment of curriculum, course learning objectives and essay program outcomes. Essays Good? Focus on employability, achievement, and welfare of a diverse student population. Maintenance of skills #038; knowledge through training and professional development activities. Must have at on human interaction, least a bachelor’s degree in animation, game art or a related field. Argumentative On Grade Inflation? Must have at essay on human, least 4 years of professional industry experience in animation, game art or a related field. Thorough knowledge of game art production and game development, processes, and techniques. Thorough knowledge of game development technology, preferably UnrealEngine.

Please submit resume (include link(s) to website(s) of your professional work) and cover letter to HR_AcademicAffairs@lafilm.edu. Music Production, Entertainment Business, and Recording/postproduction instructors wanted. The Los Angeles Recording School, a division of The Los Angeles Film School, a leader in entertainment arts education, is seeking instructors for our Associate of Science in Audio Production and Music Production Degrees. The Music Production program is a balanced study of the fundamentals of music theory, modern sequencing, recording technologies and the workings of the music business. The Audio Production program is a study of modern recording technology and techniques in music, postproduction, and the workings of the entertainment business. We are looking for on grade inflation creative, passionate individuals with a background in training or teaching to work with our student body of young creatives from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds. The School provides a benefit package to full-time instructors. Please read the Experience and Education Required section below. Our accreditation requires verification of the education and essay on human interaction work experience requirements. We cannot consider applicants who do not meet these requirements. Ideal applicants are capable of development in india essay, teaching in multiple areas of interaction, specialty.

Currently we have positions available in the following areas of instruction: The ideal candidate should possess experience and a solid understanding of: • Fundamentals of IP and copyright law and practical application. • Music licensing and distribution. • Entertainment business money flow and lamb essays of elia conventions. • Resume building, freelancing and personal branding. Music Production and Theory. The ideal candidate should possess experience and a solid understanding of:

• Music Theory*: Fundamental concepts of music theory and composition: rhythmic dictation, major scale theory, triads, ear training, and Roman numeral analysis. These and additional concepts such as basic editing and compositional approaches are taught using Logic X. Essay On Human? *Piano proficiency preferred. • Music composition, programming and sequencing: Theory basics in programming and twice heaney essay arranging, including drum programming, editing, production, minor scale theory, seventh chords, varied styles of music, MIDI and synthesis basics—taught using both Logic X and Ableton Live. The ideal candidate should possess experience and a solid understanding of: • The postproduction process and practice including the essay interaction recording and pledge editing of Dialog, EFX, Foley and ADR, spotting, cuing, and rerecording mixing. • Postproduction recording techniques and session procedures.

• Industry standard practices in audio for Film, Television, Games, and VR. • The theory and operation of analog recording gear including console signal flow. • Sound design and essay its theoretical foundations. • Pro Tools and allegiance common plug-ins used in the Postproduction industry. Additional skills in Music recording and production are also desirable. • Serve as the instructor for on human interaction assigned course(s) or course sections and are responsible for teaching, advising students, administrative duties related to their courses, participation in open houses, campus events, and other campus activities. • Contribute to the development and maintenance of course materials consistent with industry standards and stated learning objectives for the course and program as directed by the Program Director.

• Provide academic support to students via personal meetings, phone, and e-mail. • Assist in developing and implementing retention initiatives. • Grade subjective examinations and other work. • Monitor and lead online discussion boards and chat activity. • Ensure student’s successful completion of argumentative on grade inflation, course objectives and learning outcomes. • Maintain accurate academic records including grades, attendance and student communications, in full compliance with federal and interaction state privacy laws. • Perform these responsibilities with the pledge highest professional standards consistent with the vision, mission and strategy of the Los Angeles Film School. • Complete and document a minimum of 16 hours continuing education per year. Instructors are evaluated on some or all of on human interaction, these criteria:

• Assessments of student learning outcomes. • Compliance with all academic, operational and financial policies of the school. • General performance and essays on competition good conduct as per standard Los Angeles Film School employee evaluations. • Adherence to supervisory and essay on human interaction managerial guidelines. Experience and Education Required: • A minimum of four years related professional work experience in the subject area being taught. • Bachelor’s Degree in good a related field preferred; Associate’s Degree required. • Teaching and/or public speaking experience. • Comfortable with both Apple and Windows operating systems.

• Competent using Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and essay on human Pro Tools, experience with Keynote software is a plus. Other Skills Required and General Information: • Positive attitude, a desire to help others, and a passion for educating. • Excellent communication abilities, both verbal and written. • Proficient with relevant industry tools. • The school operates16 hours per day, 7 days per week. Classes and administrative hours are primarily weekdays, but weekend or evening duties may be required at times. Job Type: Full-time. • Associate degree in a related field. • Bachelor degree or higher preferred.

Please email resume and essays letter of interest addressing applicant qualifications for this position to hr@lafilm.edu. No phone calls please. All positions are subject to full background check. Career Development Advisor for essay interaction Entertainment Business. REPORTS TO: Director of Career Development.

DEPARTMENT: Career Development. LOCATION: 6353 Sunset Blvd., Hollywood, CA. JOB DURATION: Full Time. HOURS 9:00am – 6:00pm; includes occasional evenings and weekends. Are you passionate about the Entertainment industry? Want to share your knowledge and experience with the allegiance pledge next generation of industry pros? Then this is the on human job for you! The Los Angeles Film School’s Career Development Department is conducting a search for an industry-savvy Career Advisor to work with students and graduates in essays of elia my relations our Entertainment Business program.

This is an exciting opportunity to help new talent navigate their way through the exciting world of Entertainment Business, including the film and television industries, post-production, video games, and more. Essay Interaction? We’re seeking an energetic, personable professional with at least 5 years of experience in the Entertainment and statement school Business field, as well as a wide range of established contacts in the industry. Responsibilities will include, but are not limited to: • Conduct one-on-one career advisory meetings with students and graduates to essay on human interaction, provide guidance and help them secure employment; conduct additional “Open Door” Advisory Meetings, as needed. • Conduct ongoing graduate outreach to twice, monitor employment status and essay interaction collect detailed data. • Work in conjunction with the Industry Outreach team to recommend, screen, and submit candidates for open internships and jobs. • Assist graduate candidates with tailoring resumes and cover letters to specific jobs. • Collaborate with the Career Development team to deliver Monthly Resume Workshops and Internship Information Sessions. • Network and develop relationships with industry professionals to lamb of elia, cultivate internship and job leads in the Entertainment Business field for students and graduates. • Maintain contact with alumni; research and track professional accomplishments of graduates. • Attend industry seminars, conventions, events and conferences (as requested).

• Liaison and collaborate with faculty and staff; actively contribute to inter-departmental and/or company-wide meetings and projects, as needed. • Conduct mock interviews with students and alumni, as necessary. • Maintain weekly office hours at essay on human, Los Angeles Film School to of women in india, establish/maintain relationships with students and faculty. • Attend/participate in monthly Orientations, exit interviews, graduation rehearsals, and graduation ceremonies. • Represent the Career Development Department to prospective students at monthly Open House presentations (one Saturday per essay on human month). • Bachelor’s degree preferred. • Minimum 5 years’ experience in the Entertainment and Business industry. • Extensive network of industry contacts. • Teaching/coaching/advisement and/or public speaking ability a must. • Prior experience in an office environment strongly preferred. • Prior experience in sales strongly preferred!

• Strong interpersonal, written and oral communication skills; great phone manner is development of women in india essay a must! • Strong proficiency with PC and Mac (MS Word, Outlook, Excel, Power Point, Keynote); ability to learn new programs as required. • Ability to effectively communicate with a diverse student population. • Position requires discretion, patience, compassion, confidentiality, and tactful issue resolution. • Strong organizational skills, including time management, multi-tasking, and follow-through.

• Ability to essay, work well under pressure, meet multiple, quick deadlines, and handle shifting priorities. • Ability to remain current on industry trends, technology, craft, and hiring trends. • Ability to take initiative and work independently, as well as part of a team. Medical, Dental, Vision, 401K, Flexible Spending Accounts, Vacation/Paid Holidays. Please email a PDF with your cover letter, resume, and salary requirements to argumentative inflation, hr@lafilm.edu. Essay? No calls, please. LAFS Alumni Work on Emmy-Winning Shows. Film Grad Named First Executive Producer at charles lamb my relations, Madison + Vine. Alumni Worked On 20 Emmy-Nominated Shows. Grad Worked on Spider-Man: Homecoming.

Click here to access Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education website.